Skip to main content

The Brady bunch

Citibank's John Reed gave a push in the right direction with a unilateral move, in May 1987, to take a
$3 billion reserve on his bank's emerging-market debt. Reed knew he would be hated: he was forcing
other banks, such as the crippled Manufacturers Hanover, to follow suit.
Mulford, who was then treasury under-secretary, wanted to take things to the next stage, passing on
that write-off to reduce the overall debt of the countries themselves. He feared that otherwise the
nominal amount of the debt would simply be capitalized and passed from the private to the public
sector. "There had to be some kind of debt relief for these countries," he said.
Origins of the Brady Plan
The October 1987 stock market crash showed that there was no escape for investors besides US,
Japanese or German government bonds. Nicholas Brady, who completed a report on that crash, was
appointed treasury secretary the next year. At a G7 meeting in Bonn there were the first discussions of
what later became the Brady Plan - a refinancing that forced banks to provide some debt relief to the
borrower. "I produced the 'truth serum paper'," recalls Mulford, "- my plan to get everyone to recognize
the problem."
The Brady Plan was announced in September. It would involve debt reduction, although the terms
hadn't been hammered out. Towards the end of that year JP Morgan put together a deal for Mexico
which anticipated Brady bonds. Creditor banks could exchange their loans at a discount for 20-year
bonds whose principal was guaranteed by a US treasury zero-coupon note. Mexico, the guinea-pig, did
its first Brady deal in February 1990. Some sources credit Gerald Corrigan, then president of the New
York Federal Reserve, with the real brainwork. Others mention Angel Gurria, the technical wizard at
the Mexican treasury, now finance minister. Still others call it the Mulford Plan. Certainly Mulford was
the figure who browbeat the financial community into accepting debt reduction.
Other countries followed Mexico: the Philippines, Uruguay, Nigeria, Brazil, Argentina, Jordan,
Bulgaria, Poland, Ecuador, Peru. But there was a catch. The debt had passed from bank balance sheets
to a wider investor universe. Bondholders had rights that couldn't so easily be modified by borrowers
and central banks. Heaven and earth - that is 17 billion of US taxpayers' dollars - were moved, in the
1995 tequila crisis, to prevent Mexico from defaulting on its Bradys.
Of course, the bonds could be marked down to their guaranteed zero-coupon value, but thereafter
Mexico's ability to refinance would be severely impaired. Some countries have bought back their
Bradys, to capture the discount. But the first Brady default will send shockwaves through the market.
Russia refused to do a Brady refinancing in 1994, showing foresight, since in 1999 it came within an
ace of defaulting on its ordinary Eurobonds. So did Pakistan. A default would deal a severe blow to a
market that has never seen a sovereign failure.
A tug on the reins
"We monitored the huge development of international bank lending at the BIS," says Lamfalussy. "It
was very difficult to slow down the enthusiasm of the banks." But apart from monitoring, the BIS was
only marginally involved in working through the debt crisis. It turned its attention to making sense of
the innovation in the financial markets, the risks of derivatives and netting schemes, and the roller-
coaster of exchange rate and interest rate volatility.
That same year, 1974, Franklin National Bank in New York collapsed because of currency speculation
by its major shareholder, Michele Sindona, the same who later hastened the collapse of Banco
Ambrosiano in Italy and Luxembourg. At the end of 1979 came the scandal of Bernie Cornfeld's
pyramid fund management scheme Investors Overseas Services, from which Robert Vesco allegedly
absconded with $240 million. Vesco was last heard of in a jail in Cuba.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

  The merchant of Venice and the cowards that fear  Enough enough already.     The Crimes; Lets cut straight to the chase.   The quote, which reads, “To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize,” was quickly identified by some users online as a quote by Kevin Alfred Strom. “Congrats, you just quoted Kevin Alfred Strom, an American neo-Nazi, who first said those words in 1993,” responded  one user. Another commented, “This quote is actually from Kevin Alfred Strom, a white supremacist and Holocaust denier who plead guilty to possession of child pornography.”  and as this is from Reuters, a platform one can trust.    You dear reader are now  a Holocaust denying kiddy diddler.    But the quote still stands.    To learn who rules over you , simply look who you cannot criticize.  Well, turn around, take off any rose colored inhibitors and look back at major events in his...

it's them again boo boo, their history

It's a pretty known fact that the Jews are chosen people and the Jewish homeland is Israel and the Jews believe in the Old Testament and that the Old Testament is about Jews.     However almost none of these facts are true nowhere in the Bible does it call the Jews gods chosen people and only about 5% of the people in the old testament could be called "Jews".    So now that you have branded me an anti-semite we can begin;    The term "anti semite"  literally means against Shem or his descendants however being anti-jewish isn't the same as being anti-semitic.       So let me explain the Semites are the descendants of a man named Shem who would father some of the world's most renowned Empires and dynasties such as the Syrian Empire and Babylonian empires. So why is it "anti-semetic" to say something against the Jews?  Well, just like stealing your religion, your homes, your money, and businesses some Jews also love stealing names...
  The Word Jew Is NOT In The Bible But Blunt Publisher Manipulation Is C H U R C H R E F O R M S E R I E S By Biblicism Institute “A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes.” – Mark Twain The word Jew is nowhere to be found in the good book The word “Jew” did not come into existence until the year 1775 A.D., whereas the occurrences in the bible took place from around 4000 B.C. to 70 A.D. WHO IS A JEW? Its modern connotation points to someone who follows and adheres to a faith similar to that of the Pharisees of Judah, but  is not  of the tribe and stock of Judah. In other words, Jews are people from nations other than the 12 Hebrew tribes who practice a religion known as  Judaism/Pharisaism , the doctrine of the Pharisees. It is much like those who believe in Christ and are called Christians, in honor of the One whom they follow, and their religion is known as Christianity, the doctrine of Christ. If one were to say th...