“COMMUNIST”
COUNCILS IN NEW ZEALAND
– and the hidden Fabian
Socialist 2006 “Draft Ten Year Plan” to
confiscate all freehold properties through
rate rises and taxes
A
WARNING FOR THE WORLD
by John D. Christian
This ‘article’ is written in the global
public interest, and may be freely reprinted or
republished, in full or in part, for
profit or not, by whomsoever wishes to use it.
© John Christian
April 2006
Before I outline the “Communist” basis of
the New Zealand City, District and Regional Council draft Ten Year Plan policies (announced by most councils in March/April
2006), it is first necessary to provide a brief history of global “local
government” in order to fully understand the real essence of what I write about.
Although the modern system of local and
regional government can be directly traced back to Babylon, when in King
Nebuchadnezzar’s time (605-562 B.C.), the city was divided up into ten distinct
regions or districts ruled by princes, under whom were mayoral governors,
captains, judges, treasurers, councilors and sheriffs – in modern times the
system of local government that we have throughout the world is derived
exclusively from the City of London Corporation.
City of London Corporation
The City of London Corporation is a Masonic,
private, independent, sovereign state occupying approximately one square mile
within the heart of the greater London area inside the old Roman walls of
London.
It either directly or indirectly, controls all
mayors, councils, regional councils, multi-national and trans-national banks,
corporations, judicial systems (through Old Bailey, Temple Bar and the Royal Courts of Justice in
London), the IMF, World Bank, Vatican Bank (through N. M. Rothschild & Sons
London Italian subsidiary Torlonia), European Central Bank,
United States Federal Reserve
(which is privately owned and
secretly controlled by eight British-controlled shareholding banks), the Bank for
International Settlements in Switzerland
(which is also British-controlled and oversees
all of the
Reserve Banks around the world including our own) and last but not least, the communist European Union and communist
United Nations Organization.
The supreme ruler of the City is the Lord
Mayor who is elected once a year and lives in the Mansion House. The City has a
resident population of about 5,000 that rises to about two million during the
week when people surge in and out each day to work. The financial centre of the
world, it is often termed the ‘wealthiest square mile on earth.’
The full title of the Square Mile’s
governing body is the ‘Mayor, Aldermen and Commons of the City of London in
Common Council Assembled.’ The Court of leadership consists of the Lord Mayor,
25 Aldermen and 130 Common Councilmen.
All of the giant, largely Jewish
international banks and corporations in the City of London that control the
world are members of one or another of the Twelve Great Livery Companies
domiciled in Guildhall (or the Hall of the City of London Corporation).
As
the result of
a ‘gentleman’s agreement’
between the sovereign
and the City’s merchants and bankers made many
hundreds of years ago, the Lord Mayor is officially head of the
Corporation and is allowed to operate independently of the sovereign. However,
the wealth of the world held in the Corporation ultimately is the sovereign’s,
because, should the gentleman’s agreement break down, the sovereign has the
power to “rescind” the Corporation’s independence. The Queen sometimes refers
to the Corporation as “The Firm.”
While ostensibly the power of the monarchy
appears to be diminishing as the Queen voluntarily gives her Commonwealth
countries their independence and they become republics chartered to the United
Nations, and she actively works toward abolishing the sovereignty of Britain as
the UK is broken up and divided into regions of the European Union – her City
of London Corporation multi-national banks and corporations are quietly taking
over the world. All of the big banks and companies in both New Zealand and
Australia are either directly or indirectly City of London-controlled.
In ancient times the City marshals and
sheriffs were employed to ensure that all the “council” rates and taxes were
paid to the City on behalf of the king. After the conquest of William the
Conqueror in 1066, who first brought the Jewish bankers to London from France,
the Jews developed written credit agreements for the king, (in French called
“mort-gages” – mort ‘death’ gage ‘bond’)
and it was the marshal’s and sheriff’s
jobs to ensure that all the interest payments of these “death-bonds”
were paid to the Jews on behalf of the king.
During the reign of Richard I (the
Lionhearted) after the serious downturn in the economy as the result of the
cost and tax impositions of the Crusades, many farmers, business people and
peasants had defaulted on their “mort-gages” throughout England. As the result,
the Jews promptly commenced seizing the commoner’s property for not paying the
interest, rates and taxes to the City and King. Subsequently, a rapid increase
in hate against the “King’s Jews” was initiated. This led to the massacre of
Jews at York in 1190. New York in America was later named by British Jewish
immigrant bankers in memory of the event.
For 100 years the commoner’s hate against
the “King’s Jews” fermented until 1290, when, under pressure from the people,
Edward III finally suspended the Mayoralty and reluctantly banished all Jews
from his kingdom when 16,000 left England – and didn’t begin to return until
around the reign of Elizabeth I (1558-1603) when the enormous power of the City really began to accelerate with the
opening of the world’s first stock exchange in London – and has continued
unabated to the present day.
While there have been rare occasions when
the Lord Mayor and Commonalty of the City, as a result of their colossal wealth
and power have been able to subtly out-maneuver the monarch, as to their
cost, Richard II, Charles I and James II were to learn to their fate –
generally speaking this has been the exception rather than the rule.
Ultimately, whoever successfully rules must have the “will” of the
people. Historically, in the City, many although certainly not all monarchs
have ruled with the “will” of their subjects – But rarely, if ever, have the bankers, rich
barons or knights been respected in this position. More often than not they’ve
been consistently hated. Even when monarchs have done a poor job, provided they
have still had the “will” of the people, the wealthy bankers’ position has been
extremely “perilous” to say the least.
After forty years of misrule by Henry III,
the Lord Mayor Thomas Fitzthomas (1261-1264) and the Aldermen defied the king.
On this particular occasion the Lord Mayor ended up being thrown into the Tower
where he died. Henry III vetoed nine Mayors in his long reign, and jailed
another who died in prison.
On one occasion the threat to the Lord
Mayor’s massive wealth and power has
not come directly from the
monarch, but from the
people themselves. Mayor Nicholas Brembre (1383-1385) had been a
king’s man during the peasant’s revolt, and was knighted by Richard II (similar
to Sir Barry Curtis, Mayor of Manukau City in New Zealand today) for curbing
the ambitions of his uncle, John of Gaunt. But Brembre had few friends among
the common people having deposed the popular Mayor Adam Stable, and when he
re-imposed the hated Poll Tax which had caused the revolt, the mob turned on
him. He was given a mockery of a trial and was then hanged, drawn and
quartered.
Understandably, therefore, from the time of
Richard II most of the “Lord Mayors” in the City of London and others in the
realm became very “cautious” and “hesitant” about any proposal which could be
seen as an “unreasonable demand” to levy rates or taxes for the City and
king. However, today these events have
all but been forgotten.
From the time of William the Conqueror in
1066 up to the time of the Reformation the City of London Corporation was Roman
Catholic. (The modern global “company” and “corporate” business system that we
know today grew out of the old Roman Catholic dioceses in England which were
the world’s first “corporations”).
During the reigns of Henry VIII (1491-1547)
and Elizabeth I (1558-1603) when the Church of England, knights and barons took
over the assets of the Roman Catholic Church in England, the City then became
Protestant.
Gradually, as the people of England
apostatized and turned away from the Protestant King James Bible, and
Christianity in general, both Roman Catholic and Protestant, in the late 1800’s
the City and Monarchy became rabidly Socialist.
The Beginning of Socialism in London
The religion of Socialism is based primarily on the teachings of the pagan Greek philosopher and writer Plato, and especially his book The Republic, in which 400 years before the time of Christ he dreamed of a “World Republic” headed not by a president, but by a royal “world philosopher king” or “prince” (like himself of course!). Both Karl Marx and Hitler were great students of Plato. It is only inevitable that the planned reformed United Nations and EU will one day be headed by this “Philosopher Prince.”
Socialism officially first began in 1880 in London when H. M. Hyndman founded the Rose Street Club which was dedicated to the destruction of Christianity in England.
In 1884 the group changed its name and came to be called the Social Democratic Federation. Its early members deceptively called themselves “Christian Socialists.” Later the group’s membership included the Jew, Karl Marx’s daughter, Eleanor Marx and her husband Professor Aveling.
Behind the scenes the group was largely controlled by Engels, Karl Marx’s partner. Because Hyndman would not obey the orders of Engels, Eleanor Marx and her husband split off with William Morris the poet and others and started an opposition group which they called the Socialist League.
On January 4, 1884, members and past members of the Social Democratic Federation, the Socialist League and others founded the Fabian Society.
Fabian Society
The first meeting of the Fabian Society was held at the home of Mr. E. R. Pease, a member of the London Stock Exchange. Two of the leading members were George Bernard Shaw and Sidney Webb. Other early members were Eleanor Marx, theosophist and occultist Annie Besant, and author H. G. Wells.
The name of the society was suggested by the Spiritualist, Frank Podmore, who named it after the brilliant, elderly, third century Roman general, censor and consul, Quintus Fabius (Maximus Verrucosus) (303-203 BC) who was made a dictator in 221-217 BC and, with his small band of fighting guerillas and superior cunning, successfully defended Rome by defeating Hannibal’s much bigger and mighty Carthaginian army through “gradualism” and “terrorism” during the time of the second Punic War.
Initially he kept to the hills and cunningly hampered the enemy’s progress by cutting off their food and supply lines with “delaying tactics” until Rome could assemble enough men to defend the city successfully. During the war, his slow, “gradual,” delaying tactics were greatly disapproved of by his soldiers and the civilians and earned him the name of ‘Cunctator’ – the ‘Delayer.’ But later, after the triumph, his skill and wisdom was highly appreciated. He died in his 100th year in 203 BC.
Fabian Socialism is a “mixture” of Fascism, Nazism, Marxism and Communism all bundled together. However, it is much more deadly because it is much more clever and subtle. The only difference between Fabian Socialism and Communism is that Communists take your house by directly sending in the “secret police” to knock your front door down – Fabian Socialists do it much more subtly and cleverly – by “gradually” taking your individual rights away, by “gradually” increasing property taxes and rates, and finally, when you can’t pay them, they send in their regional “council tax inspectors” to take your house away – but the end result is the same.
British PM Tony Blair and President George Bush Junior’s globalist “war on terror” is a classic Fabian Socialist strategy.
The philosophy of the Fabian Society was written in 1887 and included the statement: “The Fabian Society acknowledges the principal tenet of Marxism … the abolition of private property … etc.” (of course this does not apply to the elect oligarchy at the top who end up owning the lot!).
Sidney and Beatrice Webb published a book of 1143 pages in defense of Bolshevism. It was entitled Soviet Communism: A New Civilization. In April 1952 the Webbs were exposed before a US Senate Committee on the Judiciary when Soviet Colonel I. M. Bogolepov, a former Red Army officer, stated that the entire text had been prepared by himself in the Soviet Foreign Office.
Appropriately, the defiant coat of arms of the Fabian Society (commissioned by author/playwright co-founder George Bernard Shaw) today (now archived) is a “wolf in sheep’s clothing.” Until recently it also appeared on the Fabian glass window (now removed) in the Beatrice Webb House at Dorking, Surrey.
Wolf in sheep’s clothing
The subversive nature of the Fabian project is illustrated by the Fabian Window, a stained-glass composition showing Fabian leaders Edward R. Pease, Sidney Webb and Bernard Shaw (in the green coat) forging a new world out of the old, while other Fabians kneel worshipfully before a stack of Fabian writings.
The window carries the logo: “Remould it [the World] nearer to the heart’s desire,” the last line from a quatrain by the medieval Iranian poet Omar Khayyam which reads: “Dear love, couldst thou and I with fate conspire/To grasp this sorry scheme of things entire,/Would we not shatter it to bits, and then/Remould it nearer to the heart’s desire!” and which expresses the Fabians’ plan to destroy and reconstruct society along Fabian lines.
The Fabian Window was commissioned by Shaw in 1910 and is currently located at the London School of Economics. Though its theme purports to be humorous, the fact is that, as admitted by Bernard Shaw, humour or what he described as “freely laughing at ourselves” was a distinguishing habit of the Fabians (Pease, p. 34). In fact, humour was a tactic used by Fabians to conceal the deadly earnest of their intentions.
Indeed, there is nothing humorous about a semi-secret organisation working to destroy Western civilisation. Moreover, the Fabian Window is undeniably symbolic and as such it is based on fact: despite claims to being “scientific,” Socialism proved to be riddled with internal inconsistencies and contradictions rendering commitment to its tenets a matter of faith rather than reason.
As observed by the economist P. T. Bauer, Socialism turned out to be a kind of faith-based messianic religion that promised salvation on earth (Bauer, p. 176). In the Fabian case, making Socialism (or Fabianism) into a quasi-religious movement was a conscious objective of the Fabian leadership as shown by Shaw’s comments to the effect that the Fabians “must make a religion of Socialism” (Henderson, p. 488). Other Fabian leaders similarly spoke of Socialism as a “new social religion”. Thus, the Fabians’ adulatory attitude towards Fabian writings depicted in the Window accurately portrays the cult-like nature of Socialism in general and of Fabian Socialism, in particular.
The window also shows, in the background (above the globe), the Fabian “coat-of-arms” consisting of a wolf wearing a sheepskin and bearing a red standard with the initials “F.S.” Again, this symbolism is undeniably based on the fact of the Fabian tactic of “permeation” and of achieving its ends by stealth.
Finally, the Society’s Iranian logo may well be a hidden reference to the reconstruction of the world order in line with international oil interests. The Anglo-Iranian Oil Company (later British Petroleum) was among the corporate members of the Royal Institute of International Affairs a.k.a. Chatham House (King-Hall, p. 140), an organisation co-founded by members of the Fabian Society and the Society has retained close links to oil interests (see below).
___________________________
Today the Fabian Society is among other things the intellectual wing of the British Labour Party. Before Tony Blair became British Prime Minister in May 1997, he was chairman of the Fabian Society.
Since the 1997 British general election there have been around 200 Fabian MP’s in the House of Commons, some of whom have formed almost entire Labour Cabinets including Gordon Brown, Robin Cook, Jack Straw, David Blunkett, Peter Hain, Patricia Hewitt, John Reid, Ruth Kelly, Alan Milburn, and Clare Short. Headed by Tony Blair, Fabians now dominate the entire British government. They are resident in all parties and sit on all important select committees, commissions and organizations allied to the government. A good web-site on the subject is: www.lindsayjenkins.com
The Fabian Society literally controls the European Union. German-born Gisela Stuart, the Labour MP for Birmingham Edgbaston since 1997, and member of the House of Commons Foreign Affairs Select Committee, was one of two House of Commons’ Representatives on the European Convention and a member of the Presidium of the Convention on the Future of Europe. The Presidium was the drafting body that created the draft Constitution for Europe. In her book, The Making of Europe’s Constitution, published in December 2003 by the Fabian Society, p. 20-21 Gisela writes:
“In the early months, the Presidium members would meet in a small room in the Justus
Lipsius Building some fifteen minute walk from the European Parliament. Attendance was limited to the thirteen members, the Secretary General Sir John Kerr, his deputy and the press officer. Sir John Kerr, a former Permanent Secretary of the British Foreign Office, conducted the proceedings inside the Presidium and in the plenary sessions of the Convention with deft diplomatic skill as might be expected from someone who John Major called ‘Machiavelli’ in his autobiography. The best description of his talents I heard was: ‘When Kerr comes up to you and asks for the time, you wonder why me and why now?’ …
On several occasions, we would retreat to the Val Duchess – a small palace used by the Belgian foreign minister. It was at one of the dinners at Val Duchess that the skeleton of the draft constitution was given to members of the presidium in sealed brown envelopes the weekend before the public presentation. We were not allowed to take the documents away with us. Just precisely who drafted the skeleton, and when, is still unclear to me, but I gather much of the work was done by Valery Giscard d’Estaing and Sir John Kerr over the summer. There was little time for informed discussion, and even less scope for changes to be made.”
Today the Labour Parties in both New Zealand and Australia are closely affiliated to the Fabian Society in London.
When Australian Labour Party Prime Minister Bob Hawke (a Rhodes Scholar), was guest of honour at the Fabian Society’s Centenary Commemoration Dinner in Melbourne on May 18, 1984, he said:
“… I gladly acknowledge the debt of my own government to Fabianism. Earlier I dealt at some length with the principle of the inevitability of ‘gradualness.’ There is another important idea, a method more than a principle – which becomes closely associated with Fabianism. Sydney Webb called it ‘permeation.’ Today it would be called ‘consensus.’
Webb put it this way. Most reformers think that all they have to do in a political democracy is to obtain a majority. This is a profound mistake. What has to be changed is not only the vote that is cast, but also the mental climate in which Parliament and Government both live and work. That I find to be an accurate description of the approach I and my colleagues have tried to bring to the affairs of the nation in our first term of office.”
In June 2001, at the Federal Government joint standing committee on treaties inquiry into whether Australia should support a statute of the UN International Criminal Court which would affect the “sovereignty” of all Australians, when criticized by an Australian patriotic group, Labour Party Senator Chris Schacht, sarcastically exclaimed he had been a member of the Fabian Society for 20 years – and further, said; “You probably were not aware that us Fabians have taken over the CIA, KGB, M15, ASIO (Australian Security Intelligence Organization), IMF, the World Bank and many other organizations.”
That is why Tony Blair, as part of the 2006 Commonwealth Games Closing Celebrations in Melbourne on March 26, was also invited by Labour officials and business leaders to speak to the Australian Parliament in Canberra on March 27 about his Fabian “war against terror,” and “intelligence matters” where he said; “The war against terror was as much a battle about values as it was about arms.” – and why, after the Australian Government meeting, he flew directly to New Zealand on March 28 to speak about the same subject at a meeting in the Auckland Town Hall, hosted by the New Zealand Labour Party Prime Minister, Helen Clark, and the Auckland Regional Chamber of Commerce and Industry – after which he participated (by video-link) in the International Climate Change Conference in Wellington on March 29, and later discussed with Prime Minister Helen Clark his (“Fabian Society”) “initiative to set up a unit in the NZ public service to enable their respective Labour Governments to co-operate more closely on policy development” (NZ Herald, March 28, 2006 pg. A3) and on “security – intelligence matters” as communist China is brought into the fold.
In the last century, members of the British Fabian Society dynastic banking families in the City of London financed the Communist takeover of Russia. Trotsky, in his biography, refers to some of the loans from these British financiers going back as far as 1907. By 1917 the major subsidies and funding for the Bolshevik Revolution were coordinated and arranged by Sir George Buchanan and Lord Alfred Milner. The Communist system in Russia was a “British experiment” designed ultimately to become the Fabian Socialist model for the British takeover of the world through the UN and EU.
Fabian Society “Five Year Plan”
The British plan to take over the world and bring in a “New World Order” began with the teachings of John Ruskin and Cecil Rhodes at Oxford University.
Rhodes in one of his wills in 1877 left his vast fortune to Lord Nathan Rothschild as trustee to set up the Rhodes Scholarship Program at Oxford to indoctrinate promising young graduates for the purpose, and also establish a secret society for leading business and banking leaders around the world who would work for the City to bring in their Socialist world government.
Rothschild appointed Lord Alfred Milner to implement the plan. At first the society was called Milner’s Kindergarten then in 1909 it came to be called the RoundTable. It was to work closely with the London School of Economics founded in 1894 by Fabian Socialist leader Sidney Webb (Lord Passfield). Today former Rhodes Scholars (such as Bill Clinton), Fabian Business RoundTable members, and graduates from the London School of Economics (the primary Fabian Socialist training school in the world) dominate the global banking, business and political systems in every country.
The British Fabian Society plan to takeover the world by the City of London financial community was first published in a book entitled All These Things by a New Zealand author and journalist, A. N. Field. The book was first published in 1936 by Omni Publications in the United States (and censored in New Zealand).
The document, called “Freedom and Planning” was secretly circulated in 1932 by the inner councils of the members of the Political Economic Plan, otherwise known as “P.E.P.” in London. The then chairman of the organization was a City of London Jew, Israel Moses Sieff, who was the reputed author of the plan. The headquarters of P.E.P. were at 16 Queen Anne’s Gate, London. Mr. Sieff was also chairman and financier of Marks and Spencer’s chain stores and was vice-president of the British Zionist Society.
Centered around City of London Jewry’s international financiers in the Bank of England subsidiary, the Bankers Industrial Development Company, the essence of the document “Freedom and Planning” was (and still is) to gradually “Sovietize” the world based on their “Five Year Plan” inaugurated in Moscow in 1927-28 in the Soviet Union.
Basically the plan involved the subtle transfer of the entire productive capacity of each country throughout the world into a series of great “State-owned” departments which would then be “corporatized”, then “privatized” to City of London Corporation, international banks and corporations which they control.
Individual property ownership would be severely restricted, with most of the land, sea, fisheries, rivers, lakes, ports, railways, communications, media, roads, electricity, energy, food, water, waste management, housing, farms, commercial property, schools, hospitals, police, social welfare, Inland Revenue etc. transferred into statutory corporations, companies or land trusts which indirectly would be owned by City of London banks. The “peasants” would still be allowed to own their own clothes, and small assets like furniture, cars and boats etc., but the main assets of each country would be owned by their multi-national corporations and banks. In essence the City of London Corporation would become the “One World Earth Corporation” and would privately own the world.
Similar to the experiment carried out in the in the USSR, the whole world would eventually be transferred into a Communist “United Nations” World Soviet Socialist Republic, where each country would be “regionalized” and ruled through “Regional Councils” through a United Nations dictatorship called a “Parliamentary Assembly” which would be just another name for a Soviet “Central Committee” – and all independent, sovereign, national governments would be totally abolished.
Fabian Society Privatization of the World
As the result of the P.E.P. Plan originally formulated in 1932, right now every country’s “State assets” (owned in trust by the State on behalf of the people) are being frantically “privatized” by City of London-controlled banks and corporations primarily under the directions of two leading Fabian Socialist writers – Sir Roger Douglas and John Redwood.
Sir Roger Douglas’s book Unfinished Business and John Redwood’s book Public Enterprise in Crisis are the primary handbooks being used by central and local government finance ministers and officers all around the world to sell off each nation’s “family silver” and State assets – with the more “sensitive” public assets being transferred into Fascist-type Public-Private Partnerships (PPP’s) which are designed to make the public masses and peasantry “think” that they have some degree of control – when in reality they have none as the real ownership of the assets are held by the City of London banks and corporations who fund them.
Until relatively recently, John Redwood was head of N. M. Rothschild & Sons London global Overseas Privatization Unit that is coordinating the entire global privatization process. Sir Roger has been contracted as a consultant by City of London Banks, the World Bank and others to advise on national privatization programs as well.
Fabian Society “Regionalization” of the World through
UN and EU Control of Regional and City Councils
All of the countries in the world currently are being “regionalized.” Presently, for example, the whole of the United States is being “regionalized” and the EU Committee of the Regions based in Brussels, is “regionalizing” every country in the European Union.
As the result of this radical “regionalization” process, Britain has now already been effectively abolished, having been divided up into 9 separate regions of the EU, plus Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. This cunning process, which is being “gradually” implemented to destroy the power of the central national government in each country is commonly being referred to as “Devolution” by the Queen and Fabian Society.
Unlike the rest of the autonomous regions in the UK which, like most of the other regions in the EU that have become virtually powerless through their representation in the European Parliament which is now only a “talking shop”, the City of London Corporation as a separate region by itself within the Union now rules it. This is because all of the Commissioners are appointed (not elected) to the European Commission by City of London-controlled business leaders and bankers in their respective countries.
Right now throughout the UK all city councils and regional councils are dramatically increasing their rate demand on their constituent’s properties, while at the same time they are quickly expanding their debt levels for unaffordable capital works programs via loans from City of London banks – which policies are deliberately intended to prepare for the councils’ “privatization” whilst transferring the local government in each country to “regional super-councils” – which ultimately will become or be controlled by “Regional Parliamentary Assemblies,” identical to the old structure in the former Soviet Union – which at first regionalized then abolished the national governments before they set up their republican socialist police state.
“Sovietization” of Local Government in New Zealand
In New Zealand, the blatant UN “Sovietization” of the entire country was implemented by the Hon. Dr. Michael Bassett, Minister of Local Government, through the Local Government Amendment Act (No.2) in 1989. This radical act reduced more than 600 different local authorities throughout the country to 94: 13 regional councils, 74 district or city councils and seven special authorities.
This new structure of local government deftly created by the act divided the whole country up into 14 “Soviet-styled” super-regions governed by 13 regional councils and a district council (with the Gisborne Region being unique in that its district council was also to become the regional council for that area.).
Under the 1989 Act, the district and city councils were designed to continue to provide essential services such as water supply, roads, sewage disposal and rubbish collection (which all ultimately would be “privatized” or transferred into “Public-Private-Partnerships (PPP’s) which would finally end up being foreign-owned) and the regional councils would take over many of the responsibilities performed in the past by many special purpose authorities formerly carried out by such agencies as catchment boards, harbor boards, pest and noxious plant authorities etc.
Ultimately, this devious plan is to transfer many of the Central Government tasks and responsibilities to regional councils as well, which will be further subtly rationalized to become or be controlled by “Sovietized” Regional Development Agencies and Regional Parliamentary Assemblies – to rule their unwary serfs and peasants under strict Communist United Nations and Marxist EU socialist law. These processes are now well advanced and are almost complete in Britain, and are accelerating in all other countries, including the United States. One could say that the Fabian Socialist global “cake is about 95% baked!”
Communist “Sustainable Development”
In 1992 at the “communist” United Nations Conference on the Environment and Development (UNCED) in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, co-chaired by former Soviet Union President Mikhail Gorbachev and N. M. Rothschild-London agent Canadian billionaire Maurice Strong, the UN unveiled a radical environmental philosophical agenda which “inverted” the traditional values reflected in the Bible, Magna Carta and US Constitution (which put man under God at the head of his creation and dominion i.e. a man’s rights were to have superiority over those of animals, fish, plants, trees and forests etc.). At the Earth Summit in Rio, an old pagan concept was introduced which “inverted” all of our existing, constitutional, democratic, personal and property rights and values espoused by Christianity – and transferred them to the environment and the religion of mother-earth Gaia worship. In this religion, a tree becomes more valuable than a human being – A rare bird more valuable than a hospital.
This United Nations program of action unveiled in Rio was called Agenda 21. It is 300 pages long and is very complex. Primarily it is designed to be implemented with other radical UN documents such as the Global Biodiversity Assessment (1100 pages), promoted by the UN Conference on Human Settlements, Habitat II. The first Habitat Conference was held in 1974 and specifically identified private property ownership as a threat to the peace and equality of the environment. It proposed to revolutionize the development of the land and cities of each country under strict “Soviet-style” environmental guidelines, called “Sustainable Development.”
The UN’s communist secret agenda through “environmentalism” and “sustainable development” is very cunning and has deceived a lot of well-meaning people. Most people genuinely want to protect the environment and ensure that the earth’s resources are “sustainable” for future generations there is no doubt. But the communist goal of “sustainable development” and “environmentalism” has absolutely nothing to do with protecting the environment or sustainability – it is all about abolition of property rights, and ultimately, collectivization of housing and farms under corporate State control.
Under this system, farmers’ and property owners’ rights would be effectively extinguished and overridden by strict Environmental and Sustainable Development resource consents and laws. They would be told where they could farm, what “sustainable” land they could “develop,” (sustainable development) what trees they could plant or cut down, what fertilizer if any they could apply, and they would need “consents” and licenses for everything under the sun. City dwellers would be in the same dire predicament, and have their homes confiscated, or they’d be severely fined, if they cut down a heritage tree, washed their car, boat or dishes using detergent, or used the privatized corporation’s water when they shouldn’t, especially if they were nabbed under their friendly “Neighborhood Watch Scheme,” which scheme, coincidentally, was first implemented in the Soviet Union. Socialism is very subtle.
The penalty for cutting a tree down without the appropriate government consent would become worse than murder. Not only would you have to license your dog, to own a dog you would have to be licensed too. Farmers would need to be licensed to operate their collectivized farms, spray weeds, care for cattle and drive their tractors under new Soviet-styled “health and safety” laws. All tradesmen and professional workers would have to be accredited and licensed, as would all Christian pastors and churches, and any other persons or institutions that could be likely to criticize their Soviet bosses.
All potential young parents would need to have a license to have children, and if there was any family genetic weakness of some sort in their state-controlled doctor’s medical records, no license would be given. In the end you would need a license or permit to take your boat on a lake, take your kid fishing off a wharf, or travel between towns or cities – In other words – full-blown Marxism.
The United Nations policy of “Sustainable Development” introduced in 1992 at the UNCED at Rio de Janeiro, and implemented through Habitat II and the UN World Commission on Environment and Development – is taken directly from the USSR Constitution, chapter 2, article 18, which reads:
“In the interests of the present and future generations, the necessary steps are taken in the USSR to protect and make scientific, rational use of the land and its mineral and water resources, and the plant and animal kingdoms to preserve the purity of air and water, ensure reproduction of natural wealth, and improve the human environment.”
National Party Prime Minister, Jim Bolger, attended the UN Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro in 1992 and signed on behalf of New Zealand to commit the country to Agenda 21 and Sustainable Development. Labour Party Prime Minister Helen Clark attended the follow-up summit in Johannesburg August 26 – September 4 2002 aptly called the “World Summit for Sustainable Development,” where she attended the head of state sessions. The summit has since been nicknamed “Rio+10 because it marked the 10th anniversary of the first Earth Summit at Rio. NZ Environment Minister Marion Hobbs led a 35-strong delegation to the giant summit, and was one of five vice-presidents nominated by the UN to lead the summit comprised of about 45,000 delegates.
Not only was N. M. Rothschild agent, Maurice Strong, Secretary-General of the UN 1992 Rio Earth Summit, he personally worked with UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan to appoint three of his own Earth Charter Commissioners to the 12-man advisory panel of the Johannesburg Summit.
World Conservation Bank
In September 1987, the 4th World Wilderness Congress was held in Denver, Colorado, USA, which established the World Conservation Bank. The congress was set up by none other than London’s (late) Baron Edmond de Rothschild, chairman of Banque Privee Edmond de Rothschild, Geneva, Switzerland, and one of the trustees of the International Wilderness Foundation that sponsored the conference.
Approximately 1500 of the world’s most powerful bankers and leaders attended the congress, which was chaired by Rothschild agent and Canadian multibillionaire, Maurice Strong. At the congress, Edmond de Rothschild designated eminent financier I. Michael Sweatman to be the first president of the World Conservation Bank. Mr. Sweatman wrote the forward of the banks charter.
Leading insiders of the biggest banks and UN agencies in the world were present, including Maurice Strong “Mr. Sustainable,” David Rockefeller head of the Chase Manhattan Bank “Mr. Development” and Mr. David Ruckleshaus head of the UN Environmental Protection Agency “Mr. Environment” – of course!
The World Conservation Bank (or an equivalent of it) is destined to become the final World Bank and the “de-coupling mechanism” for City of London parent banks to take over the assets of every country of the world. The essence of their secret plan is this: After an orchestrated period of global financial chaos triggered by a major war in the Middle East or man-made state of emergency or natural disaster, in which most of the world’s banks will be deliberately collapsed in the process, (wiping everybody’s savings out in the crash), key City of London banking parent creditors, are going to takeover all the “mort-gages” (death-bonds) and assets of the world, and transfer them to the World Conservation Bank (or its equivalent). The plan is very esoteric and cunning, and very difficult for most to understand.
Already most government treasury departments are preparing for such an event. As part of the preparation for this momentous event, all of the world’s individual currencies are to be merged into two or three major currency groups, two of which are to be the euro and the U.S. dollar. Finally, these currencies are to be replaced with the World Conservation Bank’s (or equivalent) new electronic global currency, “World Currency Unit” or “Earth Dollar” This new currency is deceptively to be issued against the collateral of 34 per cent of the Earth’s surface that is presently being transferred into huge UN Heritage Parks and Conservation areas in every country across the globe, under the crafty deception of “Sustainable Development.” In short, the biggest banking conspiracy and deception ever to face mankind!
George W. Hunt, (95 Camino Basque, Boulder, Colorado 80302, U.S.A.), a US businessman, attended the Congress and produced a video about it exposing their wicked and incredibly deceptive plans. On his video he plays excerpts of key speeches recorded at the congress. One such speech was made by David Lang, a leading US financier and close personal friend and business partner of Maurice Strong, who said:
“When the auditor finally gets his hands into the balance sheet, I suggest therefore that this be sold not through a democratic process. That would take too long and devour far too much of the funds to educate the cannon fodder unfortunately which populates the earth. We have to take an almost elitist program that we can see beyond our swollen bellies and look to the future in time frames and in results – which are not easily understood or which can be, with intellectual honesty, be reduced down to some sort of simplistic definition.”
“CANNON-FODDER” – is what these leading, arrogant, banking conspirators of the UN “Sustainable Development,” “Smart-Growth,” and World Conservation policies think of the world general population – including all New Zealanders.
THESE are the wicked men that all the millions and millions of naïve local / central government politicians and business leaders throughout the world are now following.
The New Zealand government has already met its commitment and transferred over 34 per cent of the entire country’s land area into UN Heritage Areas and Conservation Parks under this deceptive plan. New Zealanders need to wake up and wake up fast.
Communist “Smart-Growth”
The main business facilitators and organizations of the UN Sustainable Development policies in the Asia-Pacific Region are the Pacific Rim Institute of Sustainable Management, the NZ Business Council for Sustainable Development and the Melbourne-based Sustainable Investment Research Group (SIRIS). Equity in this group, SIRIS, coincidentally, is held by IOOF Funds Management and broking house JBWere – that provide research for N.M. Rothschild & Sons’ Ethical Share Trust based in London.
The 1995 session the United Nations General Assembly passed a number of rules. Rule 61, 62 and 63 gave local government, civil organizations and private citizens the right to participate directly in the development and implementation of these documents.
Directed by the IMF, World Bank, UN, and Prince of Wales International Business Leaders Forum, the philosophy of “sustainable development” basically says that there
are plainly too many people on planet earth and there are not enough resources to go around. What we need to do is urgently reduce the population, preserve, conserve, and “ration” the remaining resources – and that the United Nations is the only body that can do it.
The World Bank already has a huge statistical database on countries and individuals – what they produce and what resources they consume, water, energy, food, raw materials, heat, waste, health, social services etc. If the net figure is a plus, they are considered to be good productive world citizens. If it is a negative, they are in line for liquidation. These are basically all the same old Socialist/Communist ideas as the “Marxist/Leninist philosophy” and “planned economy” that permeated the old Soviet Union.
In 1992 at Rio, another key “Soviet-styled” strategy proposed by the Agenda 21 Program of Action from the United Nations Conference on the Environment and Development (UNCED) was “Smart-Growth.”
This agenda can be found in a UN companion book called Global Biodiversity Assessment published by Cambridge University Press. It proposes to model all the cities in the world on the Israel Moses Seif P.E.P plan and the “planned” economic system of development used by Lenin and Stalin under the old Communist Soviet system of local government.
The UN “Smart-Growth” legislation in the United States was first passed in the State of Maryland in March 1997. Since then, it has been gradually introduced by city and district councils all around the world – including our own here in New Zealand. Of course, rarely if ever will you hear of the policy coming from a foul brood of UN international bankers. While virtually all of the general public are largely oblivious of this fact, usually individual councils will be happy to credit themselves as authors of the plans.
Bribery of Local Government Politicians
Based on a City of London corporate banking formula, a policy to provide for “more appropriate rates of remuneration for council members” was planned for in the Local Government Act (No.2) 1989. This was essentially recommended to effectively “bribe” City Council, District Council, Regional Council and Community Board members throughout New Zealand, particularly in the bigger councils, to implement the Fabian Socialist policies from the Central Government and Treasury which aimed to dramatically increase property rates and taxes in the future, whether ratepayers or constituents agreed with them or not.
Subsequently, these sweeping remuneration changes were proposed by the politically appointed Higher Salaries Commission on April 2002 increasing Auckland Mayor John Banks annual salary from $47,007 to $146,107, a pay rise of $99,100, Manukau Mayor Sir Barry Curtis a pay rise of $35,111, Hamilton Mayor David Braithwaite a pay rise of $27,381, Auckland Regional Council Chairwoman Gwen Bull a pay rise $37,872 and Tauranga Mayor Jan Beange a pay rise of $9461.
Since April 2002, it is not just a coincidence that these are precisely the councils that have been amongst the biggest culprits that have demanded the most onerous rates rises from their struggling citizens.
For example, Tauranga City’s proposed average rate rise for the 2006-2007 year was leveled at 16.3 per cent (when inflation, wage rises, benefits, pensions etc. and the change in the consumer price index was running at about 3 per cent).
Even a five year old kindergarten child knows that this huge disparity is entirely unfair and “unsustainable” for the majority of their citizens, yet these highly over-paid Lord Mayors, Councilors and UN vassals of the realm have the cheek and audacity to call their plans “Smart-Growth” and “Sustainable Development.”
Pauperization of Pensioners and the Middle Class
Just as there is a “close relationship” between the remuneration rises of leading local body politicians with the overall level of council rate-rise demand, so there is a “close relationship” between the level of council rate-rise impositions and the financial status of people living in each council ward or constituency. The Fabian bankers already “own” the properties held by ratepayers with a “mort-gage” on them. This includes all private homes, farms, businesses and commercial property, local and central government debt. All young people with student loans and welfare beneficiary groups also come under this category. By and large central bankers believe this group is not a worry as they are already under their strict control and firmly in their grip through welfare dependency or mort-gage “death-bond” fealty.
But the one group that Fabian Socialists hate the most are the “freehold” property-owners. Hence, this group, more often than not, is the “middle class” that is predominantly comprised of middle-aged citizens and more particularly pensioners who are generally the most asset-rich. As a result of this phenomenon all global residential property taxation and ratepayer tax policies are now being subtly targeted against these particular groups to confiscate all their properties.
Essentially the Fabian City of London banks envisage this to be achieved through a variety of measures including onerous council rate-rises, capital gains taxes on more expensive residential properties, stamp duties, the introduction of Home Equity Release Loans (usually for over-60’s), aged health care, social welfare and superannuation programs that debit the cost from the value of recipient property estates, the introduction of Residential Equity Taxes and attacks against Family Trusts.
Since council taxes were introduced in Britain in 1993, the average council bill has increased by 121 per cent – but it has soared by 149 per cent in areas which have a lot of older residents.
Chichester is the worst offender with a 173 per cent increase. The average bill in the West Sussex town, where 23 per cent of residents are retired, has jumped from £456 in 1993-1994 to £1,244 for 2005-2006. In the Dorset coastal town of Christchurch, where pensioners make up 30 per cent of the population, the bills have soared by 171 per cent from £441 to £1,193.
Of the 20 local councils in England with the highest numbers of pensioners, 18 have seen their bills rise faster than average over the past 12 years, according to the research by Halifax Bank. (Daily Mail, Saturday, November 26, 2005).
The targeting and planning of these exorbitant rate rises comes not primarily from local councils, but from Central Government and Treasury officials through the Minister of Local Government and the Department of Internal Affairs acting under various OECD or UN agency guidelines.
Borrowing Powers of Councils and the Stealing of Ratepayer’s Properties
Early in 1994 submissions were called for on Department of Internal Affairs plans to repeal the 1956 Local Authority Loans Act and for new borrowing powers to be placed in the 1974 Local Government Act.
Up to 1994, most local authority borrowing had to be approved by the Local
Authorities Loans Board which ensured that all long-term borrowing by councils for a Capital work or asset had to be secured by future rates revenue. Since some loans were exempted from the control and monitoring of the Board, such as redemption loans, loans up to $50 million for local authorities with populations more than 20,000, and loans up to $15 million for local authorities with populations of less than 20,000, it was proposed that the Local Authorities Loans Board should effectively become redundant – and new laws should be implemented which would allow all local authorities to manage their financial costs and risks themselves with details of their proposed borrowing programs included in their annual plans. By 1997 councils were allowed to borrow up to 15 per cent of their city’s land value. By June 1997, for example, Manukau City Council’s debt was 11.5 per cent of the city’s land value.
Ultimately, what these Fabian, City of London banking despots want is to change the system of valuing each nation’s property from “land value” to “capital value” or “rental value” (yes, they want both your land and your house) – then through their deputized local government “Soviet Commissars,” introduce a Five or Ten Year Plan to “gradually” keep increasing the maximum threshold that limits the level of local government borrowing as a percentage of the total capital value of the city or region – up to a level that during a planned global economic crisis and downturn, they can cause the councils to default, and implement draconian rate rises on unwary ratepayers and the general peasantry – and finally implement the Israel Moses Sieff and Fabian Society’s global plan to confiscate everybody’s properties as they previously did under their Five Year Plan in the Soviet Union.
Hence, the “Ten Year Plan” now being introduced by all councils throughout New Zealand comes not from their own naïve inspiration – but under the direct Fabian Socialist banking fraternity’s devious plan inserted into Section 93 of the New Zealand Local Government Act 2002 – by political vassals of the treasury and New Zealand Parliament, which is now become no more than a rudimentary “talking shop” of low-level office clerks of international City of London UN bankers.
London School of Economics
The London School of Economics in London was founded on the initiative of Fabian Socialist leader Sidney Webb (Lord Passfield).
The funding for the early development of the school was provided by a handsome endowment under the Will of Sir Earnest Cassel (nickname ‘Windsor Cassel’), the German Jewish close friend and financial advisor of King Edward VII, who was instrumental with Jacob Schiff, head of Kuhn, Loeb and Company, New York, with Paul Warburg, a partner in the firm, in establishing the United States Federal Reserve Board in 1913 – which now controls the entire banking system in America.
Professor J. H. Morgan, K.C., in the Quarterly Review of January 1929, said he once asked Lord Haldane, a long time friend of Sidney Webb why the endowment had been given and Lord Haldane replied: “Our object is to make this institution a place to raise and train the bureaucracy of the future Socialist State” – and they certainly have!
Now both the New Zealand and Australian government bureaucracies are brimming full of individuals who have been specifically trained in this college or at Oxford as Rhodes Scholars.
Parliamentarians for World Order:
(now called: Parliamentarians for Global Action)
Following a meeting at Ashville in North Carolina in February 1947 a Fabian front organization going under the name United World Federalists was established under the leadership and funding of two City of London banking agents, Norman Cousins and James Paul Warburg.
Both men were members of the US Council of Foreign Relations, the American sub-branch of the immensely powerful Royal Institute of International Affairs (recently renamed Chatham House) which is now the City of London Corporation international business policy “think tank” of the business world based in London. James Warburg’s Jewish father, Paul Warburg (1868-1932) and his brother Felix Warburg were both partners in N. M. Rothschild & Sons London international banking house subsidiary, Kuhn, Loeb and Company, New York, headed by Jacob H. Schiff.
When the huge Chase Manhattan Bank was created by the union of the Rockefeller-owned Chase Bank with the Kuhn, Loeb and Company-controlled Manhattan Bank, N.M. Rothschild & Sons in London took over control, with Rockefellers only owning about 4% of the shares in the merged company. Paul Warburg was instrumental in founding the US Federal Reserve in 1913. Dr. Carl Melchoir who founded the Bank for International Settlements in Basle, Switzerland, in 1930, (that controls the NZ Reserve Bank) was a partner in Rothschild’s international banking subsidiary, M.Warburg & Company, based in Frankfurt, Germany. M. Warburg & Company was headed by Max Warburg who was also Paul Warburg’s brother.
Today, not only does the Chase Manhattan Bank through two of its New York nominee shareholding companies control the Westpac Banking Corporation in Australia, and consequently its sister branch in New Zealand, it is also the appointed New Zealand Government Banker.
In 1952 the ‘World Association of Parliamentarians for World Government’ then appeared with a secret blueprint to create a special organization for “parliamentarians” dedicated to abolishing each nations’ national sovereignty and replacing it with world government through a reformed United Nations. Douglas Reed in his book The Battle for Rhodesia quotes from its documents.
On May 4, 1958, a debate on the Association’s plans for ‘World Order’ was held in the British House of Lords. Nineteen years later, Parliamentarians for World Order was founded on November 23, 1977, to work with an organization originally called Union of European Federalists founded in Luxembourg in September 1946, renamed World Movement for World Federal Government, in Paris, December 15, 1946, and finally renamed World Association for World Federation (WAWF) in 1956.
Since its founding in 1977, Parliamentarians for World Order has worked hand in hand with the WAWF, and their affiliated sub-groups, Young World Federalists renamed World Federalist Youth Movement for a New International Order, and Youth for Development and Cooperation, renamed more recently ‘Just World Order through a Strengthened United Nations.’
Another group that Parliamentarians for World Order has worked with is World Government of World Citizens, founded September 4, 1953, in Ellsworth, ME, in USA, that has been behind the Fabian’s plans to institute a World Citizenship, World Passport, World Identity Card, World Dollar or World Currency Unit. The WAWF now has its head office at the UN, 777 UN Plaza, in New York.
In 1986 Parliamentarians for World Order changed its name to Parliamentarians for Global Action. Since this date the organization has worked closely with the Global Ratification Network and the World Constitution and Parliament Association for the ratification and implementation of the Constitution for the Federation of Earth.
As a favorite “baby daughter” of the British Sovereign, New Zealanders fill a large number a world leadership positions way out of proportion to the size and population of their little country – and this is no better illustrated than through their membership of Parliamentarians for Global Action.
In 1981, NZ Labour MP Richard Prebble was appointed one of the 12 Councilors of Parliamentarians for World Order (PGA). NZ’s Mr. Nick Dunlop, was first Secretary-General up to 1989 when former New Zealand diplomat, Dr. Kennedy Graham, took his place. [Coincidentally, Dr. Graham’s brother, former National Party MP for Remuera, and former Minister of Justice and Minister in Charge of Treaty of Waitangi negotiations, Mr. Douglas Graham (now Sir), in 1997 was paid by the Rockefeller Foundation to attend a 4 week in-house program at Bellagio near the shores of picturesque Lake Como in Northern Italy, to map out New Zealand’s UN Maori Settlement process. (NZ Herald May 10, 1997)]
By 1986 Labour Party MP Helen Clark was Branch Secretary in New Zealand, when approximately 40 members of the New Zealand Parliament were members. Now the Labour Prime Minister of New Zealand, Helen Clark is still a member of PGA.
National MP Katherine O’Regan, in a letter dated February 21, 1991, provided a list of MPs by country as it appeared in the PGA’s Annual Report. The ten countries with the largest membership in order were: Canada – 97, USSR – 80, UK – 50, Peru – 41, Brazil – 40, USA – 38, Australia – 31, India – 30, Denmark – 24, and New Zealand 17.
In 1989, former PGA member, MP Kerry Burke (now Sir), and former Speaker of the New Zealand Parliament, led a delegation on a trip to Russia to study President Gorbachev’s reforms. The Dominion newspaper June 15, 1989, ran a report on Mr. Burke’s trip. It was headed: “Perestroika Just Like Rogernomics” and said, “…Mr. Burke said it was quite staggering to see the similarities between the Soviet reforms and those occurring in New Zealand and other Western Economies … it is just about identical in every respect”.
It is not just a coincidence that former Labour Party NZ Finance Minister, Sir Roger Douglas, since retiring from Parliament, has been contracted as a consultant for the World Bank to advise on “privatization” programs in both Brazil and the newly restructured Soviet states.
In 1990 the PGA established its “Eminent Persons Panel” to honor some of its most cherished members. The late Labour NZ Prime Minister, David Lange, was appointed to the panel for his work as World Recruitment Officer. Subsequently Mr. Lange was honored by the Queen.
NZ MPs who were early members of PGA as at February 21, 1991, were: J. Anderton, D. Caygill, M. Cullen, P. East, J. Hunt, D. Lange, M. Moore (who more recently was Director-General of the WTO), R. Story, K. O’Regan, G. Braybrooke, H. Clark, S. Davies, J. Elder, G. Kelly, C. Matthewson, R. Prebble, and F. Wilde. In 1994 MP Michael Laws stated that he was a member.
As at March 22, 2004, PGA members of the NZ Parliament were: Jim Anderton (PC = Progressive Coalition), Rick Barker (L = Labour), Tim Barnett (L), Dr Don Brash (N = National), Gerry Brownlee (N), Dr Ashraf Choudhary (L), PM Helen Clark (L), Dr Michael Cullen (L), David Cuniffe (L), Lianne Dalziel (L), Rod Donald (G = Green), Helen Duncan (L), Harry Duynhoven (L), Ruth Dyson (L), Jeanette Fitzsimons (G), Martin Gallagher (L), Phil Goff (L), Ann Hartley (L), Pete Hodgson (L), Jonathan Hunt (L), Annette King (L), Keith Locke (G), Janet Mackey (L), Steve Maharey (L), Nanaia Mahuta (L), Trevor Mallard (L), Dr Wayne Mapp (N), Damien O’Connor (L), Mark Peck (L), Jill Pettis (L), Lynne Pillay (L), Ross Robertson (PC), Dr Linda Scott (N), Ken Shirley (A = Act), Dr Nick Smith (N), Jim Sutton (L), Paul Swain (L), Nandor Tanczos (G), Georgina Te Heuheu (N), Judith Tizard (L), Pansy Wong (N), Dianne Yates (L). [Labour:29, National:7, Green:4, Progressive Coalition:2, Act:1 = total:43].
Work is now well advanced to add a “second assembly” to the United Nations, possibly to be called a “Peoples’ Assembly,” which will be controlled by a type of Central Committee as was the case in the former Soviet Union.
In 1945, when the UN was created out the old League of Nations, the President of the Council of the League of Nations was M. M. Litvinoff – former Bolshevik Commissar for Foreign Affairs. From 1945, virtually all of the Under-Secretaries of the United Nations Security Council, (Under-Secretary for Security and Political Affairs) based in New York, have been former Russian Communist generals. Arkady Alexandrovitch Sobolev was the first, holding the position from 1946 to 1949.
Parliamentarians for Global Action’s statement on “Global Governance” up to 1995, was largely taken from “The Stockholm Initiative.” One of the 32 co-authors of the document was Sweden’s PM Ingvar Carlsson – a close personal friend of Mikhail Gorbachev.
Three weeks after signing the Sino-Soviet Agreement (between China and the Soviet Union) in April 1991, when Gorbachev was in Oslo picking up his cheque and Nobel Peace prize in May, (for ending the Cold War and allowing for the overthrow of the old Communist order in Eastern Europe) he said: “To me it is self-evident that if Soviet Perestroika succeeds there will be a real chance of building a New World Order.” An understatement if ever there was one! – since he still says he is a devout Communist!
In November 2004 the European Parliament approved, by a large majority, the appointment of 25 new Commissioners who will run the EU for the next five years. Virtually all these individuals are rabid Socialists and at least seven of the new commissioners are former members of the Communist Party, including the new European Commission President, Jose Manuel Durao Barroso, and the new European Commissioner for Taxation, Laszlo Kovacs, who was a leading Hungarian Communist. Since becoming the new President of the Commission, Mr. Barroso has given Mr. Siim Kallas the EU Portfolio covering Administration, audit and Anti-Fraud Measures. Prior to his appointment with the EU, Mr. Kallas was a high ranking Communist in the Soviet Union.
The United Nations Organization, EU and Parliamentarians for Global Action are not, as they often commonly deceptively claim, “interfaith” organizations. They are Communist to the core.
OECD “Residential Equity Tax” and Property Confiscation
On June 20, 2001, the McLeod Tax Review interim paper was released, prior to the final 200 page report’s final presentation to the NZ Government in October 2001. That report recommended that the Government introduce a new “Residential Equity Tax” on all owner-occupied and rental housing throughout the country, while at the same time, limit all tax paid by the wealthy in New Zealand to a cap of $1 million).
The tax review chairman, Rob McLeod, at the time, also served on the Treaty of Waitangi Fisheries Commission and was a member of the “Fabian” Business Roundtable. He is now the chairman of the NZ Business Roundtable.
Once again, like the “Sustainable Development” and “Smart-Growth” policies being introduced by councils, “Residential Equity Tax” is not the creation of the McLeod Tax Review itself, but is a recommendation from the international City of London Fabian Socialist banking despots at the OECD.
The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), based in Paris, is the international economic policy divisional arm of major City of London banks and multinational corporations, which work closely with the UN, to reform all of the major economic policies of national governments around the world.
In 1998 the OECD was lobbying to pass the Multilateral Agreement on Investments (MAI), which would give corporations unlimited rights in any country that signs the agreement. The MAI is designed to establish a whole new set of global rules for investments that will grant transnational corporations the unrestricted right and freedom to buy, sell, and move their operations whenever and wherever they want around the world, unfettered by government intervention or regulation. In short, the OECD through the MAI seeks to empower transnational corporations by severely restricting what national governments can and cannot do, ultimately to allow the banks and corporations to privatize and own everything and destroy the sovereignty of individual nations.
The NZ Herald June 21, 2001, p.C1, published an article on the McLeod Tax Review proposals for Residential Equity Tax and said:
“The option under consideration, similar to the one in use in the Netherlands, uses the risk-free return method.
It takes the value of the house at the start of the year, less any debt owing on it. That figure is then multiplied by the inflation-adjusted return on a risk-free investment such as a one year Government bond and the end amount is taxed at the investor’s tax rate.
For example: David and Ruth own a $200,000 house with a $100,000 mortgage. His marginal tax rate is 39c in the dollar, hers is 21c. The real, risk-free return is 4 per cent.
The taxable “income” from their owner-occupied house is therefore $4,000, which is split equally between them, so he pays an extra $780 in tax and she pays $420.
The review said that the extra tax raised of $750 million a year should be applied to reducing income tax.
Mr. McLeod said the impact of the tax would fall more on the rich than the poor and it would depress the value of houses as buyers took account of the extra tax.
The rationale for the tax is that if the money tied up in the house were used elsewhere it would most likely generate income.”
Of course, with a $1 million tax cap on the wealthy, the tax is carefully designed to confiscate the homes and rental investments of pensioners and the middle class, predominantly the only people left in the entire country that own any property of substance that isn’t already owned by the major corporations or is heavily mortgaged.
Fortunately, in 2001, there was a public outcry, and the Helen Clark Labour-led Government didn’t have the “courage” to implement McLeod’s deadly Fabian recommendations. However, they have “broken the ice” and the Fabian-controlled media continue to remind the public that “there is too much money tied up in the Nations’ housing stock” indicating their plans are still alive and well and simmering on the backburner to gradually confiscate private property.
There is a distinct possibility that the huge increases in council rates globally at present are primarily being used to “pressure’ the general populace to accept some major change in the structure of funding local body government in the near future – possibly the subtle introduction of a Residential Equity Tax of some sort, or a Poll Tax, although the latter is probably not going to suit their plans, because historically the Fabian Society’s major objective has always concentrated on the abolition of private property, and Poll taxes traditionally in Britain going back hundreds of years have been consistently hated. Traditionally, a number of Lord Mayors have “lost their heads” as the result of harsh Poll Tax policies.
Fabian Plan to “Microchip” Everyone on Earth
Coincidentally, not only do the Fabian, “Christian Socialist” banking despots in the City of London and Church of England want to enslave everybody on earth through debt, thievery and economic blackmail under their Ten Year Plan. Finally they want to abolish all cash and cheques completely, and introduce a cashless-based “Soviet-style” surveillance system for all buying and selling centered on the micro-chipping of everyone on earth. What they want is total control of the masses – total police state power!
Presently the Blair Government microchip-based Identity Card Bill is being debated in the House of Commons and House of Lords. It is proposed that the system will be implemented and fully operational by 2008, and after that date in Britain you will not be able to travel overseas, buy food or petrol without the card.
The bankers already know that the card can be easily lost or stolen, and they are planning for it to be quickly replaced with implantable microchips. All countries are following the British system. As the result of new standards imposed on Telecom NZ by City of London banks through the new EMV (Europay, Mastercard, Visa) security standards for electronic transactions, in 2004 Telecom NZ signed a large contract to convert all of New Zealand’s 80,000-plus Eftpos mobile banking terminals to Verifone Implantable Microchip-reading Terminals.
The whole project is planned to be completed by 2008 – ready for their secret plan to microchip everybody in the country starting with dogs. Key propaganda phrases for the project are: “One never knows which dog may bite; therefore all dogs must be micro-chipped.” “One never knows who is a sexual predator or terrorist, therefore all citizens must be micro-chipped” – “One law for all – no exceptions!” – and watch those “Letters to the Editor” columns too – some are not actually written by members of the public themselves, but are written by treacherous newspaper editors and journalists who “follow the line” of their global paymasters – an old Nazi trick used in the Third Reich.
Abolition of the Legal System and the coming
World, Socialist “Philosopher Prince”
THE FABIAN SOCIETY wants the Westminster Parliamentary and Constitutional System of government to be totally abolished. The old, established Christian-based laws based largely on the Bible, Magna Carta, Habeas Corpus, Double Jeopardy, the Right to Trial by Jury etc. are to be abolished – and replaced with the old Inquisitional, Napoleonic code of dictatorial law called Corpus Juris, which is already the established legal system now in the European Union – similar to communist China and Russia.
Old Bailey, Temple Bar and the Royal Courts of Justice in London, British Houses of Parliament, and the US Capitol in Washington DC are all in line for total annihilation.
While Guy Fawkes (and the Catholic Jesuits) failed to blow up the Protestant House of Commons and English Parliament on November 5, 1605 – from without – now the Marxists and Fabians led by Tony Blair and others from within, are preparing the world for their soon-coming communist “revolution” – and Plato’s “socialist” world republican royal “philosopher prince” and consort to complete the task – who will, like the masked vigilante “V” and his consort in the Fabian movie, V FOR VENDETTA – abolish the United States of America, blow up the British Houses of Parliament, and through his philosophical wisdom, love of truth and justice, rise up against the totalitarian Nazi state of tyranny and oppression, fraught with cruelty and corruption – come and save the world – and free its struggling citizens forever! May God help us all!
The Solution: - (or is the nation “past the point of no return”?)
Can ratepayers, at least in the short term, hold councils to account over unacceptable rate rises? Yes they can. Talk to local mayors and councilors. Some are quite genuine, and you’ll be surprised at how many are absolutely oblivious as to what is really happening. Education and honesty are the keys to success. It pays to speak up. After a revolt, the State Government in California in 1976 passed Proposition 13 which forced local councils to reduce rates on their citizens, although they are now once again rising.
In May 1996, Benjamin Netanyahu was elected Israel’s youngest Prime Minister. He was thrown out three years later, and was again re-elected to become Israel’s new Finance Minister. During that term, he introduced some of the most rapid, breathtaking, Fabian “privatization” programs and social reforms ever undertaken in the world using Sir Roger Douglas’s radical book, Unfinished Business. He met Sir Roger in Jerusalem at a think-tank symposium in 2004, and like many other countries, structured Israel’s rapid sell-off on New Zealand’s global, guinea-pig “Rogernomics” model.
However, unlike the case in New Zealand, where most of the general population were either sound asleep or incredibly apathetic, Israel’s “pensioners” were not so impressed with his rapid sell-off of their precious “family silver.” They took major steps to rectify the situation, and in the recent General Election in Israel on March 29, 2006, right-wing Likud Party leader Benjamin Netanyahu, and the other 10 members of his treacherous party were humiliatingly defeated.
The biggest surprise of the entire election came from the newly created Pensioners’ Party headed by former Mossad spymaster chief, Rafi Etian, which gained seven seats – for its single issue program – “protect the rights of pensioners” and “don’t sell off our birthright.”
Right now the creation of such a party in New Zealand is well overdue.
As an elementary start the Central Government should be pressured to quickly pass a law to ensure all citizens’ property rates are equitable, and if necessary, force councils to lower their ambitions, live within their incomes, and subsequently reduce their rates burdens substantially if necessary – not through Fabian Rates Rebates! Secondly, the Government should introduce a bill to limit all future rate rises to “no more than the change in the consumer price index.” Thirdly, a bill should be passed to “severely restrict all local government and council borrowing to levels that can be easily serviced without the necessity to unreasonably increase rates and taxes in the future.”
HOWEVER, will this ever happen?
When the two major, leading political parties in the country, Labour and National, are both deeply wrapped up in the pockets of Treasury controlled by City of London international bankers – and a high proportion of our MPs are political puppets who dance to the tune of Parliamentarians for Global Action – while the New Zealand Labour Party is more Fabian Socialist than British PM Tony Blair on a good day in the House of Commons – the City of London Jewish banking despots have now got a “mort-gage” ‘death-bond’ over the entire country to the tune of about $135 billion and rapidly rising – foreign British-controlled companies control and censor the entire media in the country, control most of the distribution and price of food, goods, communications, transport and energy supplies – an aligned judiciary and police force – and most of the general population is overwhelmingly ignorant and apathetic – it would sadly appear that we have almost “passed the point of no return” and that there is now little hope of changing the situation – short of the inevitable, soon-coming Marxist “revolution” the Fabians anticipate, have in mind, and have long since planned.
A full-scale war is taking place. In short, all New Zealanders need to wake up and wake up fast.
For if they don’t, every single vestige of what they have worked for is soon going to be insidiously taken away from them and their grandchildren – for the Communist 10 Year Plan presently being implemented by councils throughout the country is the “beginning” of the Fabian Society’s final “coup de grâce.”
Author Denis Mckenna, in his timely book, Which Way New Zealand? – National Sovereignty or World Government poignantly quotes Marcus Tullius Cicero, the great Roman philosopher, orator and statesman (106-43 BC), who eloquently wrote:
“A nation
can survive its fools, and even the ambitious, but it cannot survive treason
from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and he
carries his banners openly. But the traitor moves among those within the gate
freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very
halls of government itself. For the traitor appears no traitor, he speaks in
accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their garments and
he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the
soul of a nation; he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars
of the city; he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A
murderer is less to be feared.”
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.