Tuesday 6 August 2019

Co2 in Submarines

PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES

 

We try to keep CO2 levels in our U.S. Navy submarines no higher than 8,000 parts per million, about 20 time current atmospheric levels. Few adverse effects are observed at even higher levels. – Senate testimony of Dr. William Happer, here

 

CO is a colorless, odorless gas (Budavari et al. 1989). Selected physical and chemical properties are summarized in Table 4-1.

OCCURRENCE

CO primarily is produced by partial oxidation of carbon-containing materials (Pierantozzi 1995). In the outdoor environment, major sources of CO are motor vehicles and fires (EPA 2000). In the indoor environment, sources include tobacco smoking, combustion engines, and combustion appliances, such as furnaces and gas stoves. On submarines, the primary sources of CO are tobacco smoking, diesel generators, and high-temperature paints (Crawl 2003). Data collected on nine nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarines indicate an average CO concentration of 5 parts per
Page 68 
Suggested Citation:"4 Carbon Monoxide." National Research Council. 2007. Emergency and Continuous Exposure Guidance Levels for Selected Submarine Contaminants: Volume 1. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11170.
TABLE 4-1 Physical and Chemical Properties of Carbon Monoxidea
Synonyms
Carbonic oxide, carbon oxide, flue gas
CAS registry number
630-08-0
Molecular formula
CO
Molecular weight
28.01
Boiling point
−191.5°C
Melting point
−205.0°C
Flash point
Explosive limits
12.5% to 74.2% (volume % in air)
Specific gravity
0.968 with respect to air
Vapor pressure
>1 atm at 20°C
Solubility
Sparingly soluble in water; appreciably soluble in ethyl acetate, chloroform, and acetic acid
Conversion factors
1 ppm = 1.15 mg/m3; 1 mg/m3 = 0.87 ppm
aData on vapor pressure are from HSDB (2004); data on explosive limits are from IPCS (2001); all other data are from Budavari et al. (1989).
Abbreviations: atm, atmosphere; mg/m3, milligram per cubic meter; ppm, parts per million; —, not available or not applicable.
million (ppm) and a range of 0-14 ppm, and data collected on 10 nuclear-powered attack submarines indicate an average CO concentration of 3 ppm and a range of 0-14 ppm (Hagar 2003).

SUMMARY OF TOXICITY

The toxicology of CO in humans was reviewed by the World Health Organization (WHO) (1999), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2000), and the NRC (2002). Only human and animal data directly relevant to derivation of the EEGL and CEGL values are discussed in this chapter.
CO interferes with the oxygenation of blood and the delivery of oxygen to tissues because it has about 245 times more affinity for hemoglobin than does oxygen (Roughton 1970). The formation of carboxyhemoglobin (COHb) reduces the oxygen-carrying capacity of blood and shifts the oxygen dissociation curve, reducing the release of oxygen to tissues. Hypoxemia and subsequent tissue hypoxia comprise the best understood mechanism of CO toxicity. The cytotoxic effects of CO independent of oxygen are subjects of current research. CO also binds to muscle myoglobin, cytochrome c oxidase, and cytochrome P-450, and many of the adverse effects of CO might be associated with those reactions (WHO 1999;
Page 69
Suggested Citation:"4 Carbon Monoxide." National Research Council. 2007. Emergency and Continuous Exposure Guidance Levels for Selected Submarine Contaminants: Volume 1. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11170.
×
EPA 2000; Raub et al. 2000). Endogenous production of CO accounts for a background COHb level of about 1% (Radford et al. 1981; Doherty 2000). The log-log plot of CO uptake and COHb saturation, as computed from the Coburn-Foster-Kane equation, is shown in Figure 4-1 (Peterson and Stewart 1975).
The brain and cardiovascular system are the primary targets of CO toxicity. The adverse effects of CO exposures range from subtle vascular and neurologic changes to more serious conditions, such as loss of consciousness and death. Even when CO-intoxicated patients receive treatments, more than 10% of survivors might experience permanent brain damage, and in many cases, the onset of adverse effects is delayed as long as 1 week or more. The primary cause of neurologic injury might be hypotension leading to impaired tissue perfusion (Varon et al. 1999). CO intoxication causes hypotension by myocardial depression, peripheral vasodilation, and ventricular dysrhythmia (Varon et al. 1999).
Morbid complications of CO intoxication are greatly affected by a variety of factors related to cardiovascular health, including the degree and duration of hypotension, and the presence of pre-existing cardiac or pulmonary disease, anemia, or cardiac dysfunction (arrhythmias or other conditions) (Ehrich et al. 1944; Stewart et al. 1975). COHb concentrations in smokers average 4% and range from 3% to 8%; heavy smokers could have COHb concentrations as high as 15% (Raub et al. 2000; Omaye 2002). Submariners who smoke theoretically might be subject to additional health risks from environmental exposure given their already elevated COHb levels.
A number of short- and long-term adaptations to compensate for reduced oxygenation of blood and tissues related to CO exposure have been identified. Those changes are found in humans and animals and include increased coronary and brain blood flow in the short-term and increased hematopoiesis over time (WHO 1999). However, cardiovascular disease might reduce or eliminate the body’s ability to compensate for CO-related hypoxemia and tissue hypoxia (WHO 1999).

Effects in Humans

Accidental Exposures
In their review of U.S. mortality records from 1979-1988, Cobb and Etzel (1991) identified 56,133 (0.3%) of the total death records (NCHS
Page 70
Suggested Citation:"4 Carbon Monoxide." National Research Council. 2007. Emergency and Continuous Exposure Guidance Levels for Selected Submarine Contaminants: Volume 1. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11170.
×

FIGURE 4-1 Carbon monoxide concentrations reached in blood (percent saturation at various durations of exposure) in a normal human subject as a function of inspired CO. Abbreviations: PB, barometric pressure; PCO2, average partial pressure of carbon dioxide in lung capillaries; VA, alveolar ventilation rate; Vb, blood volume; M, equilibrium constant; DL, diffusing capacity of the lungs; [COHb]o, control value of carboxyhemoglobin prior to carbon monoxide exposure; VCO, rate of endogenous carbon monoxide production. Source: Peterson and Stewart 1975. Reprinted with permission from the Journal of Applied Physiology; copyright 1975, the American Physiology Society.
2002) that indicated CO toxicity as a contributing cause of death. Acutely fatal CO poisoning is likely due to hypoxia and its adverse effects on the heart, as suggested by the large number of patients who exhibited marked hypotension and lethal arrhythmias prior to CO-induced death.
Sokal and Kralkowska (1985) provided an analysis of 39 patients (18-78 years of age) intoxicated by CO produced from the combustion of household gas or coal-stove gas. Of the 39 patients exposed to CO, 16 showed mild intoxication and 12 showed moderate intoxication exhibiting symptoms, such as headache, vomiting, tachycardia, and breathing problems, after exposures that lasted about 5 h. COHb concentrations averaged
Page 71
Suggested Citation:"4 Carbon Monoxide." National Research Council. 2007. Emergency and Continuous Exposure Guidance Levels for Selected Submarine Contaminants: Volume 1. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11170.
×
27%. Eight patients presented with symptoms of severe intoxication, including loss of consciousness and pathologic neurologic signs, tachycardia, and tachypnea after exposures that lasted about 9 h. COHb concentrations averaged 34%. Four subjects exhibited very severe effects, including central nervous system (CNS) damage, and circulatory and respiratory disturbances after exposures that lasted about 10 h. COHb concentrations averaged 31%. The subcommittee notes the lack of agreement between the total number of patients in the study and the number of patients categorized by clinical degree of intoxication.
Ely et al. (1995) reported adverse effects of CO exposures in employees of a sewing company located in a warehouse where a propane-fueled forklift was in operation. Thirty people were exposed to CO concentrations at up to 386 ppm. The five workers who exhibited the most severe symptoms had an average estimated COHb concentration of 35%. One of those workers had seizures. The majority of people exposed reported CNS, behavioral, gastrointestinal, and cardiovascular abnormalities, including headache (93%), dizziness (63%), nausea (60%), chest pain (57%), difficulty breathing (23%), visual changes (20%), and confusion (17%). Eleven of 25 patients contacted 2 years after exposure reported seeking medical care for persistent symptoms.
Hassan et al. (2003) reported two cases of CO poisoning that resulted in sensorineural hearing loss. The subject of the acute poisoning case, a 30-year-old man, presented with a COHb concentration of 29.9%. That subject showed only partial recovery from hearing loss. A 61-year-old woman reported to have endured chronic CO exposure presented with bilateral hearing loss that improved with time. Overall findings indicate that CO affects high-frequency hearing (1-8 kilohertz).
Experimental Studies
The adverse clinical effects of CO have been evaluated extensively in both healthy and high-risk individuals (WHO 1999; EPA 2000); however, only the studies that are most relevant to the safety of submarine crew members (healthy adult males) are discussed here. Table 4-2 summarizes the relevant experimental studies in humans. Chiodi et al. (1941) conducted controlled exposure studies in which four male subjects were exposed to CO at 1,500-3,500 ppm repeatedly for durations of 70 minutes (min) or longer. The subjects had COHb concentrations at up to 52%. There were no adverse effects on basal oxygen consumption, ventilation, pulse rate, blood pressure, or arterial blood pH in that study. The only adverse effect
Page 72
Suggested Citation:"4 Carbon Monoxide." National Research Council. 2007. Emergency and Continuous Exposure Guidance Levels for Selected Submarine Contaminants: Volume 1. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11170.
×
TABLE 4-2 Human Toxicity Summary
Concentration (ppm)
Exposure Duration
COHb %
Number of Subjects
Effects
Reference
NS
NS
NS
NS
Linear relationship described betweendecline in VO2-max and increasing COHb2
EPA 1979; Horvath 1981
NS
NS
4.5
NS
Decrements in brightness discrimination in trained subjects
MacFarland et al. 1944
NS
NS
6-7
50
Deficit in “careful driving” skills
Wright et al. 1973
NS
NS
8-12
20
No adverse effects on visual discrimination or depth perception
Ramsey 1973
NS
NS
9
18
No decrement in night vision
Luria and McKay 1979
NS
NS
10 and higher
3
Increased reaction time; decreased precisionin maintenance of separation distance between cars; decrease in estimation of time
Ray and Rockwell 1970
700
Time needed to reach target COHb
11 and 17
27
Driving not “seriously” affected; statistically significant increase in roadway viewing time
MacFarland 1973
100
NS
0-20
49
Numbers of errors and completion time increased with increasing COHb concentrations for several but not all tests of cognitive ability beginning at COHb concentrations <5 at="" cohb="" concentrations="" no="" occurred="" p="" ptoms="" subjective="" sym="">
Schulte 1963
NS
NS
40-45
4
Inability to perform tasks requiring minimal exertion
Chiodi et al. 1941
Page 73
Suggested Citation:"4 Carbon Monoxide." National Research Council. 2007. Emergency and Continuous Exposure Guidance Levels for Selected Submarine Contaminants: Volume 1. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11170.
×
NS
5-60 min
15-20
NS
Oxygen uptake in tissues unchanged during submaximal exercise
Chevalier et al. 1966; Pirnay et al. 1971; Vogel et al. 1972
NS
15 min
~5-21
5
Maximal physical performance was reduced with increasing concentrations of COHb
Ekblom and Huot
1972
300
45 min
~5
20
Increased reaction time to visual stimuli; light detection sensitivity and depth perception unaffected
Ramsey 1972
50
1 h
2.1
9
“No untoward subjective symptoms or objective signs of illness”
Stewart et al. 1970
100
1 h
~2.5
10
“No untoward subjective symptoms or objective signs of illness”
Stewart et al. 1970
~10,000 “booster dose,” 225 maintenance
~1 h
~18-20
8
Reduced maximal oxygen uptake; during submaximal exercise, oxygen delivery to tissues is maintained by increased cardiac output but smaller arteriovenous oxygen concentration difference
Vogel and Gleser 1972
50
1.5-2.5 h
~2
3, 5, or 9, depending on the test
Observed impaired vigilance; no effects on response latency, short-term memory, and ability to subtract numbers mentally
Beard and Grandstaff 1975
250
1.5-2.5 h
~7
3, 5, or 9, depending on the test
No effects on vigilance, response latency, short-term memory, and ability to subtract numbers mentally
Beard and Grandstaff 1975
Page 74
Suggested Citation:"4 Carbon Monoxide." National Research Council. 2007. Emergency and Continuous Exposure Guidance Levels for Selected Submarine Contaminants: Volume 1. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11170.
×
Concentration (ppm)
Exposure Duration
COHb %
Number of Subjects
Effects
Reference
27-100 to maintain target COHb
2 h
5, 10, 15, and 20
16
Cardiovascular system compensated for reduced oxygen carrying capacity of blood by augmenting heart rate, cardiac contractility, and cardiac output for submaximal upper and lower body exercise; compensatory mechanisms began to fail at moderate exercise and CO exposure
Kizakevich et al. 2000
11,569 initially, 142 maintenance
2.25 h
~ 17
21
Visual function not affected
Hudnell and Benignus 1989
500
2 h-2 h and 20 min
~26 (after 2 h and 20 min)
6
“Increase in heart rate with minimal exertion;” frontal headaches after 1 hr of exposure; minimal exertion intensified headache pain; headache pain peaked 3.5 h post-exposure; changes in visual evoked response at COHb >20%, returned to normal at COHb <15 p="">
Stewart et al. 1970
100
2.5 h
7
NS
Decrements in two learning tasks; no changes in several other measures of intellectual performance
Bender et al. 1971
100
2.5 h
5.7
16
Increased response times noted in the secondary task of a dual-task procedure in which the primary task was tapping a board
Mihevic et al. 1983
Page 75
Suggested Citation:"4 Carbon Monoxide." National Research Council. 2007. Emergency and Continuous Exposure Guidance Levels for Selected Submarine Contaminants: Volume 1. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11170.
×




with a stylus, and the secondary task was announcing or subtracting numbers appearing on a display

0-1,000; gradually rising concentration reached 1,000 after 2 h and was maintained for 30 min
2 h 30 min
~32 (peak at 2.5 h)
2
Headaches noted during exposure became incapacitating 6 h post-exposure and were not ameliorated with a night’s sleep; clinical chemistries and electrocardiograms remained normal; changes in visual evoked response at COHb >20%, returned to normal at COHb <15 and="" coordination="" for="" hand="" impairment="" manual="" noted="" p="" performance="" reaction="" tests="" time="">
Stewart et al. 1970
2, 50, 100, 200, 500
2.5 h
Up to 20
27 (in groups of 2-8)
No impairment in ability to perform time estimation tests
Stewart et al. 1973
2, 50, 100, 200, 500
2.5 h
Up to 20
27 (3 sessions with 1 subject, 47 sessions with 2-8)
Time estimation ability, manual coordination, inspection, and arithmetic performance not impaired
Stewart et al. 1975
0, 50, 125, 200, 250
3 h
1, 3, 6.6, 10.4, 12.4
10
No symptoms and no effects on time perception and tracking performance; subjects exposed at 200 and 250 ppm were not blinded regarding exposure
Mikulka et al. 1970; O’Donnell et al. 1971
Page 76
Suggested Citation:"4 Carbon Monoxide." National Research Council. 2007. Emergency and Continuous Exposure Guidance Levels for Selected Submarine Contaminants: Volume 1. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11170.
×
Concentration (ppm)
Exposure Duration
COHb %
Number of Subjects
Effects
Reference
5, 35, 70
4 h
1, 3, 5
30
Dual-task conditions included hand-controlled tracking with low- and high-frequency conditions and monitoring lights and responding with a button press to indicate brighter lights; differences in tracking performance noted in the 70-ppm group after 3 h of exposure and in the 35- and 70-ppm exposure groups after 4 h in the high-frequency condition; reaction times on the light detection task increased in the 35- and 70- ppm exposure groups in the final hour of exposure
Putz 1979
70
4 h
5
12
Dual-task conditions as in Putz (1979) and auditory vigilance; statistically significant differences in tracking, response time on light monitoring, and auditory vigilance after 1.5-2 h of exposure
Putz et al. 1979
200
4 h
~16 (after 4 h)
11
Three subjects reported “mild sinus” headaches in the 4th h; headaches vanished 30 min to 2 h post-exposure; no impairment of coordination, reaction time, and visual acuity
Stewart et al. 1970
Page 77
Suggested Citation:"4 Carbon Monoxide." National Research Council. 2007. Emergency and Continuous Exposure Guidance Levels for Selected Submarine Contaminants: Volume 1. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11170.
×
0, 50, 100, 175, 250
4 h
NS
18
Ability to estimate the length of an auditory signal, compared with a standard signal, reduced at all CO-exposure concentrations; time to onset of performance deficit decreased with increasing CO exposure
Beard and Wertheim 1967
<2 100="" 200="" 500="" 50="" p="">
5 h
Up to 20
27 (in groups of 2-8)
No impairment in ability to perform time estimation tests
Stewart et al. 1973
<2 100="" 200="" 500="" 50="" p="">
5 h
Up to 20
27 (3 sessions with 1 subject, 47 sessions with 2-8)
Time estimation ability, manual coordination, inspection, and arithmetic performance not impaired
Stewart et al. 1975
100
8 h
11-13
2
“No impairment”
Stewart et al. 1970
50
24 h
~8
3
“No untoward subjective symptoms or objective signs of illness”
Stewart et al. 1970
50
5 d
7
15
No effects on visual functions
Davies et al. 1981
0, 15, 50
24 h/d, 8 d
0.5, 2.4, 7.1
30
Electrocardiographic P-wave changes in 3 of 15 subjects in 15-ppm group and in 6 of 15 subjects in 50-ppm group
Davies and Smith 1980
Abbreviations: COHb, carboxyhemoglobin; d, day; h, hour; min, minute; NS, not stated; ppm, parts per million; VO2-max, maximal oxygen consumption.
Page 78
Suggested Citation:"4 Carbon Monoxide." National Research Council. 2007. Emergency and Continuous Exposure Guidance Levels for Selected Submarine Contaminants: Volume 1. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11170.
×
observed was increased cardiac output (20-50% over baseline) at COHb concentrations greater than 40%.
COHb concentrations at 40% caused drastic reductions in the ability of subjects to perform tasks requiring even minimal strength (Chiodi et al. 1941); however, COHb concentrations at 15-20% did not appear to elicit that effect (Chevalier et al. 1966; Pirnay et al. 1971; Ekblom and Huot 1972; Vogel and Gleser 1972; Vogel et al. 1972; Kizakevich et al. 2000). Some controlled experimental studies have found a linear relationship between COHb concentrations at 5-20% and decrements in human exercise performance, measured as maximal oxygen uptake (EPA 1979, 1984, 1991; Horvath 1981; Shephard 1983, 1984). However, the decrements were not considered clinically significant.
From a pool of 18 healthy men (24-42 years of age), Stewart et al. (1970) exposed groups of 2-11 to CO concentrations ranging from 25 to 1,000 ppm for periods of 30 min to 24 h. The exposures took place in sedentary exposure chambers. The study evaluations included measurements of hand and foot reaction time in a driving simulator, Crawford collar and pin tests, Crawford screw tests, a hand steadiness test, the Flanagan coordination test, a complete audiogram, a resting 12-lead electrocardiogram, and measurements of visual evoked response. CO was well tolerated at concentrations up to 100 ppm (COHb at 12.5%) for up to 8 h, eliciting no subjective signs or visual or performance impairments. During a 4-h exposure at 200 ppm, 3 of 11 subjects developed mild sinus-like symptoms during the last hour of exposure when COHb concentrations were their highest (about 16%). Mild headaches occurred at the end of the first hour of a 2-h exposure at 500 ppm (COHb at 25.5%) and were followed by excruciatingly severe occipitofrontal headaches at 3.5 h post-exposure.
Alterations in visual evoked response and other neurobehavioral end points have been inconsistently reported by investigators. For example, some studies reported no adverse effects on vision, visual evoked response, visual discrimination, depth perception, tracking, or manual coordination in subjects who had COHb concentrations ranging from 3% to 20% (MacFarland et al. 1944; Stewart et al. 1970, 1975; Ramsey 1972, 1973; Putz 1979; Putz et al. 1979; Luria and McKay 1979; Davies et al. 1981; Hudnell and Benignus 1989).
Putz (1979), Putz et al. (1979), and Mihevic et al. (1983) used dual-task procedures to evaluate neurobehavioral performance at COHb concentrations up to 5.7% for exposure durations of 2.5-4 h. The primary manual tasks tested were tracking with a hand control (Putz 1979; Putz et al. 1979), and tapping targets on a board with a stylus (Mihevic et al. 1983). Second-
Page 79
Suggested Citation:"4 Carbon Monoxide." National Research Council. 2007. Emergency and Continuous Exposure Guidance Levels for Selected Submarine Contaminants: Volume 1. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11170.
×
ary tasks were detecting light brightness and responding with a button press (Putz 1979; Putz et al. 1979) and “digit manipulation” that entailed calling out a number on a display or calling out the result of subtracting the number from 100 (Mihevic et al. 1983). In all three studies, the reaction times for the secondary tasks increased after exposure. For example, in Putz (1979) and Putz et al. (1979), reaction times for the highest-exposure condition increased about 70-80 milliseconds. The potential adverse effects described by Putz (1979), Putz et al. (1979), and Mihevic et al. (1983) were considered clinically insignificant.
Beard and Wertheim (1967) reported decrements in time-estimation ability in a study of 18 subjects exposed to CO at 0, 50, 100, 175, and 250 ppm for 4 h. The authors saw a dose-dependent decrease in correct responses. Decrements occurred within 25 min of exposure at 250 ppm, within 30 min of exposure at 175 ppm, within 50 min of exposure at 100 ppm, and within 90 min of exposure at 50 ppm (Beard and Wertheim 1967). COHb concentrations were not reported; however, on the basis of Figure 4-1, 4-h exposures at 50, 100, 175, and 250 ppm would result in COHb concentrations of about 3%, 5%, 8%, and 10%, respectively. In contrast, Mikulka et al. (1970) and O’Donnell et al. (1971) exposed 10 subjects to CO at 0, 50, 125, 200, and 250 ppm for 3 h and found no consistent differences in tracking, time estimation, or the Pensacola Ataxia Battery at any exposure concentration. COHb concentrations averaged 1%, 3%, 6.6%, 10.4%, and 12.4%, respectively. The authors noted that the subjects in the 200- and 250-ppm trials were not blinded regarding exposure (Mikulka et al 1970; O’Donnell et al. 1971). Stewart et al. (1973, 1975) could not replicate the Beard and Wertheim (1967) findings using three different time-estimation tasks, including the one employed by Beard and Wertheim (1967).
Beard and Grandstaff (1975) exposed groups of three, five, or nine subjects to CO concentrations at 0, 50, 175, and 200 ppm for 2 h. COHb concentrations corresponding to the exposures were <2 175="" 1975="" 200="" 2="" 5-6="" 50="" 7="" a="" about="" affected="" and="" arousal="" at="" authors="" but="" by="" co.="" co="" concluded="" confounded="" consistently="" contributed="" control="" decrements="" difficulty="" digit="" eard="" effects="" exposure="" found="" grandstaff="" groups="" in="" increased="" interactive="" learning.="" mitigated="" nature="" not="" of="" p="" perception="" perceptual="" performance="" ppm.="" ppm="" problem-solving="" related="" results="" span="" spatial="" task="" tasks.="" tasks="" tests="" that="" the="" time-estimation="" to="" tracking="" vigilance="" were="" which="">
Page 80
Suggested Citation:"4 Carbon Monoxide." National Research Council. 2007. Emergency and Continuous Exposure Guidance Levels for Selected Submarine Contaminants: Volume 1. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11170.
×
Putz et al. (1979) observed performance decrements in auditory vigilance after 1.5-2 h exposure to CO at 70 ppm (COHb at 5%). Christensen et al. (1977) exposed 10 subjects for 2 h under four conditions: no exposure, exposure to low oxygen (17%), exposure to CO at 114 ppm, and exposure to CO at 113 ppm in a low-oxygen environment. The authors noted a vigilance performance deficit under low-oxygen conditions (0.5% COHb), but they noted no differences from controls during the CO or CO in low-oxygen exposures. COHb concentrations during those exposures were 2.5% and 2.6% at 50 min and 4.8% and 5.1% at 120 min, respectively.
CO exposures associated with COHb concentrations as low as 6% and as high as 17% have been found to affect performance on driving measures, such as time required to respond to a velocity change in a lead car, glare recovery, hand steadiness, and roadway viewing time (Ray and Rockwell 1970; MacFarland 1973; Wright et al. 1973). However, no serious decrements in driving ability occurred at COHb concentrations 17% (MacFarland 1973).
CO exposures associated with COHb concentrations at 7% affected subjects’ ability to learn 10 nonsense syllables and decreased subjects’ ability to recite a series of digits in reverse order; however, subjects showed no changes in ability to perform other tasks involving calculations, analogies, shape selection, dot counting, and letter recognition (Bender et al. 1971).
Benignus (1994) conducted a meta-analysis of the neurobehavioral effects of CO exposures that included data from a number of the studies described above (Ramsey 1973; Stewart et al. 1970, 1973; Wright et al. 1973; Christensen et al. 1977; Putz et al. 1979). Data on how CO exposure affected vigilance, reaction time, hand steadiness, visual threshold, time discrimination, and reasoning were included. The resulting dose-response curves indicated that COHb concentrations of 18-25% are required to produce 10% deficits in neurobehavioral functions in healthy, sedentary adults (Benignus 1994).
Davies and Smith (1980) conducted an 18-day experiment in an enclosed environment where 8 days of exposure were preceded by a 5-day control period and followed by a 5-day recovery period. Fifteen naval serviceman were exposed to CO at 15 ppm, another 15 were exposed to CO at 50 ppm, and 14 servicemen served as controls. The mean COHb concentrations in the 15- and 50-ppm exposure groups were 2.4% and 7.1%, respectively. Electrocardiographic P-wave changes greater than 0.1 millivolts (mV) were observed in 3 of the 15 subjects exposed to CO at 15 ppm and in 6 of the 15 subjects exposed to CO at 50 ppm after 2 days of expo-

Gun Control

I will add to this as time goes on

 33 318 gun Incidents in 2019..of which 8837 died there was 37000 killed in motorvehicle acidents in 2018 and a popultion of 327,167,000 of which about 78% are adults 15-80 odd or 255190260 people or a 0.013056141% chance of a gun related incedent or 0.014498986 of being killed in a car crash. and being killed in a gun incedent 0.003462906% chance • The odds of becoming a lightning victim in the U.S. in any one year is 1 in 700,000. The odds of being struck in your lifetime is 1 in 3,000. or 0.033333333%



https://www.gunviolencearchive.org/

Changes to firearms law - prohibited firearms




Last updated 24 April 2019
New firearms laws are now in effect amending the Arms Act by:
  • Banning most semi-automatic firearms and some pump action shotguns; and also certain large capacity magazines. There are limited exemptions.
  • Placing controls around who may possess parts of prohibited firearms.
There will no longer be a category of firearm known as a military style semi-automatic firearm (or MSSA) and the old "E" endorsement will be obsolete.
The newly banned items will be called prohibited firearms, prohibited magazines, and prohibited parts. New offences involving prohibited items carry tougher penalties.
Transitional provisions allow for an amnesty until six months after the buy-back is announced so that those in possession of prohibited items have time to notify Police and can hand over their firearm/s to Police at a later stage when we advise of that process.
The below video by Senior Sergeant Patrick Hannon shows examples of firearms people are still able to use, as well as firearms that are now prohibited.

Information on prohibited firearms

Prohibited firearms parts and magazines

List of legal and prohibited firearms

What should I do if I have a prohibited firearm?

If you have a firearm, part, or magazine that is now prohibited, you are required store it securely. We also ask you to please complete the notification form below.
We request that people do not hand in firearms to Police at this stage.
The collection of firearms will occur at a later stage and you will be advised of the process for this. Please complete the firearm notification form via the button below.

Completing the online form

If you have already notified us online prior to 5.20pm on 24 April 2019, and wish to update some of the details (e.g. firearm make and model, address, phone numbers), please phone our call centre on 0800 311 311 between 7am and 10pm.
If this is your first time notifying New Zealand Police of your intention to hand in firearms please use the online form via the button below.
Important: Use Google Chrome or the latest version of Safari.
You will need to sign up to create an account. A one-time email verification is necessary to create an account*.
Notify Police of your firearm/s (link is external)
Please note:
  • You will receive a ‘Firearms Notification Activation’ confirmation email with a code to verify your account. The email will come from a secure “Microsoft – On behalf of New Zealand Police” account.
  • You will then be able to create a password to use with your verified email account to sign in.
You need the following on hand to help complete the online notification:
  • The details of the firearm(s) or items (including serial numbers where known)
  • The Firearms Licence Number of the owner of the firearm (where known)
  • Bank account details (in case you are eligible for the buy-back compensation scheme)
  • Business details (if applicable)
*If you do not have a valid email address or need help completing the online notification form please phone our call centre on 0800 311 311 between 7am and 10pm.
It is important existing pest controllers note themselves as pest controllers when completing the form if they intend to apply for an exemption.
Dealers and collectors should not complete the form and should continue to securely store their prohibited items. Police will be in contact regarding next steps.

Privacy statement

The information you provide on the Firearm Notification Form is collected for the purpose of administration of the Arms Act 1983. NZ Police will hold, store, use or disclose the personal information to enable it to carry out its lawful functions, including prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of offences. Please refer to the Privacy section of our website for more information.

FAQs

Firearms changes FAQs

Exemptions

The following categories of exempt persons will be able to apply for an endorsement and permit to possess prohibited items. Forms are being developed and should be available soon.

Exemption categories

Amnesty

The amnesty on possession of prohibited firearms, parts, and magazines will run for six months from the time the buy-back scheme is put in place by regulation.
Police encourages any person now in possession of a firearm to safely secure it and notify Police by completing the online form or calling 0800 311 311. This will enable Police to contact you in the future about the process for handing in your firearm/s and about the buy-back for prohibited items.
Please do not hand in your firearm/s to Police at this stage.

Indicated buy-back

The details of a compensation scheme are being worked through now and information on what that looks like will be announced in due course.
Notifying Police of the prohibited items you are holding will mean you can be contacted about compensation and the process for handing in your prohibited item when details are finallised.
More information: Legal framework for gun buy-back scheme announced (link is external)

New offences and enforcement

The Act also contains a number of new offences and penalties including the following:
  • maximum penalty of 10 years imprisonment:
    • using a prohibited firearm to resist arrest
  • maximum penalty of 7 years imprisonment:
    • unlawful carriage or possession of a prohibited firearm in a public place
    • presenting a prohibited firearm at another person
    • carrying a prohibited firearm with criminal intent
    • possessing a prohibited firearm while committing any offence that has a maximum penalty of 3 years or more
  • maximum penalty of 5 years imprisonment:
    • importing a prohibited item
    • unlawful possession of a prohibited firearm
    • supplying or selling a prohibited firearm or magazine
    • without lawful purpose, assembling a prohibited firearm or converting a firearm into a prohibited firearm
  • maximum penalty of 2 years:
    • possessing a prohibited part or magazine
    • supplying or selling a prohibited part

Support

If the changes are causing you stress or anxiety, you can get support by calling or texting 1737 anytime, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week to talk it through with a trained counsellor 1737.org.nz (link is external).

Previous changes to firearms

The 21 March 2019 changes made by an Order in Council are superseded by this amendment.

 ---  THE HISTORY OF 'GUN CONTROL'  ---

Every genocide or holocaust in history has been preceded by revolutionary, military or civilian disarmament (Gun Control).

In 1890, the U.S. 7th Cavalry Regiment, disarmed Big Foot's (Chief Spotted Elk) band of Lakota (Sioux) near Wounded Knee Creek on the Lakota Pine Ridge Indian Reservation in South Dakota.  Shots were fired, and unable to defend themselves, 90 men, and 200 women and children were murdered.  At least  20 soldiers of the U.S. 7th Cavalry Regiment received the 'Congressional Medal of Honor' for this!  This event is known as the 'Wounded Knee Massacre'.

There are many other American Indian - U.S.A. conflicts before the year 1900 of disarmament (gun control) of Native warriors, causing some tribes the hardship of walking to Indian reservations or Indian Territory, and some of their chiefs and others treated as prisoners-of-war and being put in prison, hanged, shot or exiled.

The Ottoman Empire (present day Turkey) established gun control in 1911. From 1915 to 1917, 1.5 million Armenians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and nearly exterminated.  This represents 50% of the 3 million Armenians who lived in the Ottoman Empire then.  This event is known as the 'Armenian Holocaust' or the 'Armenian Genocide'.

The Soviet Union under Joseph Stalin established gun control in 1929. From 1929 to 1953, about 20 million dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and murdered.

Under Adolf Hitler, Germany established gun control in 1938.  From 1939 to 1945, 13 million dissidents, 6 million being Jews, were unable to defend themselves, were rounded up, murdered, and for the Jews, nearly exterminated, because that was Adolf's policy, to exterminate the Jewish [Hebrew] race!  For the Jews:  this was 1 out of 3, or 6 million out of 18 million Jews worldwide who were exterminated in the NAZI concentration camps.  Every Jew today has a story to tell concerning a relative murdered in the concentration camps.  This event is known as the 'Holocaust'.

Under Mao Tse Tung, a revolutionary Communist leader, and later the 1st Chairman of the Communist Party of China, had gun control established in parts of China and then mainland China as a whole, starting in 1935. From 1948 to 1952, 20 million political dissidents, unable to defend themselves were rounded up and murdered.  Mao's stated philosophy was "Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun.", meaning gun control gives him the power to take over.  From 1966-1977, there was the Great Proletarian 'Cultural Revolution' where millions of Chinese were persecuted by the Red Guards including harassment, public humiliation, hard labor, imprisonment, torture, seizure of property and execution.

During WWII the Japanese decided not to invade America because they knew most Americans were ARMED!  In 1941, Japanese Marshal-Admiral of the Navy and Commander-in-Chief of the Combined Fleet, Isoroku Yamamoto [a Harvard grad], had said, "You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind each blade of grass."

Guatemala established gun control in 1964. From 1964 to 1981, 100,000 Mayan Indians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and murdered.

Uganda, under Idi Amin Dada, established gun control in 1971. From 1971 to 1979, 300,000 Christians, religious leaders, journalists, artists, senior bureaucrats, judges, lawyers, students and intellectuals, criminal suspects, and foreign nationals, unable to defend themselves, were murdered.

Cambodia established gun control in 1956. Under Pol Pot, from 1975 to 1977, one million educated Cambodians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and murdered.

56 million defenseless people rounded up and murdered in the 20th Century because of gun control.

Since the creation of Islam in 622 AD, Islamic nations have adhered to the Qu'ran, Hadith, Sharia Law, or Islamic Law, which considers non-Muslims (Jews, Christians, atheists) to be infidels who are to be fought in order to be converted to Islam or murdered.  Since 622 AD, hundreds of millions of non-Muslims in the Middle East have been murdered, and their churches and synagogues destroyed or converted to mosques, because they did not convert.  Wouldn't it be good if these non-Muslims had been armed?

Today in America, Chicago and Detroit which have had a history of having the strictest gun control, have had the highest murder rate in America.  Gun control, as a means of exterminating its citizens, or controlling crime and protecting law abiding citizens, has been a dismal failure in every nation it was introduced throughout history!

Guns in the hands of honest citizens save lives and property, but gun-control laws will be against the law-abiding citizens.

The next time someone talks in favor of gun control, please remind them of this history lesson.  With guns, we are "citizens". Without them, we are "subjects".

Concerning Switzerland:
-- Nearly every household in Switzerland has a gun!
-- Switzerland's government trains every adult whom they issue a rifle.
-- SWITZERLAND HAS THE LOWEST GUN RELATED CRIME RATE OF ANY CIVILIZED COUNTRY IN THE WORLD!!!

It's time to speak loud before the Dems (Leftist, Socialists) and other anti-2nd amendment believers silence and disarm us Americans.

History has shown that tyrannical governments always manipulate tragedies in an attempt to disarm the people.

Don't let our U.S. government waste millions of our tax dollars in an effort to make all law-abiding American citizens an easy target with gun control!  If you value your freedom, please spread this anti gun-control message everywhere you can that you are a firm believer in the 2nd Amendment (the right to own a gun)!


Guns ...

 Half a league, half a league,

Half a league onward,

All in the valley of Death

   Rode the six hundred.

“Forward, the Light Brigade!

Charge for the guns!” he said.

Into the valley of Death

   Rode the six hundred.

“Forward, the Light Brigade!”

Was there a man dismayed?

Not though the soldier knew

   Someone had blundered.

   Theirs not to make reply,

   Theirs not to reason why,

   Theirs but to do and die.

   Into the valley of Death

   Rode the six hundred.

Cannon to right of them,

Cannon to left of them,

Cannon in front of them

   Volleyed and thundered;

Stormed at with shot and shell,

Boldly they rode and well,

Into the jaws of Death,

Into the mouth of hell

   Rode the six hundred.

Flashed all their sabres bare,

Flashed as they turned in air

Sabring the gunners there,

Charging an army, while

   All the world wondered.

Plunged in the battery-smoke

Right through the line they broke;

Cossack and Russian

Reeled from the sabre stroke

   Shattered and sundered.

Then they rode back, but not

   Not the six hundred.

Cannon to right of them,

Cannon to left of them,

Cannon behind them

   Volleyed and thundered;

Stormed at with shot and shell,

While horse and hero fell.

They that had fought so well

Came through the jaws of Death,

Back from the mouth of hell,

All that was left of them,

   Left of six hundred.


When can their glory fade?

O the wild charge they made!

   All the world wondered.

Honour the charge they made!

Honour the Light Brigade,

   Noble six hundred!