The solution is to avoid being drawn into energy draining affairs of no consequences
The solution is real knowledge over repeated group think
The solution is not in any mass movement as they are all steered and controlled
The solution is not getting harvested and controlled whilst having the knowledge of how things are working
The solution is knowing the real goals underneath the stated objectives
The solution is not looking for some big event or movement to change things for you, that is part and a big part of the problem Once you know how things work the solution should appear if you have any first hand knowledge of what is being imposed, why and by whom.
so lets try this;
We are an unaffiliated group of local residents concerned about the lack of democratic process in local government planning and policy.
We will remain unaffiliated as individuals acting collectively and within the law towards a truly inclusive democratic process where all voices are heard.
We are not affiliated with any group or organization whatsoever.
This does not mean that we do or do not endorse other groups. We do not agree with arriving at a “Consensus” through being steered into predetermined outcomes by trained facilitators either working for the council or public/private partnerships.
We deem this to be against the public interest and an affront to democracy.
It's a pretty known fact that the Jews are chosen people and the Jewish homeland is Israel and the Jews believe in the Old Testament and that the Old Testament is about Jews.
However almost none of these facts are true nowhere in the Bible does it call the Jews gods chosen people and only about 5% of the people in the old testament could be called "Jews".
So now that you have branded me an anti-semite we can begin; The term "anti semite" literally means against Shem or his descendants however being anti-jewish isn't the same as being anti-semitic.
So let me explain the Semites are the descendants of a man named Shem who would father some of the world's most renowned Empires and dynasties such as the Syrian Empire and Babylonian empires. So why is it "anti-semetic" to say something against the Jews?
Well, just like stealing your religion, your homes, your money, and businesses some Jews also love stealing names andinheritance.
So, Shem is the son of Noah the guy who built the ark when Mesopotamia flooded the Sumerian Kingdom would be destroyed by the flood and the Semites would descend from the Caucasian Mountains and established the Acadian Empire.
Shem would have children and one of his descendants could be named Eber. He would be the father of the Hebrew people and the semites would be called by his name.
So according to the Bible Abraham was a Hebrew and not a Jew who God promised the father of many nations not one single Jewish Nation but many nations and that through him all the families of the world would be blessed.
Abraham would pass this blessing down to his son Isaac but not to Ishmael.
Isaac would have twin sons named Essa and Jacob; again the abrahamic blessing would be passed down with the younger brother Jacob who would then be renamed to Israel. Israel would then have 12 sons, who would each become their own tribes and then their own nations. While Esau would conquer the Horites and flee to Mount Seir in 1926 bc. Mix with the local cave dwellers which would later becom the land of Canaan. ( note the reason why Esau didnt get his fathers blessing, was that Esau married a canaanite woman, going directly against the word of god,Genesis 28:6-8 )
One of his sons would be named Judah who would be the father of the Jewish people and all Jews are related to him.Even though all jews are Israelites. The majority of Israelites are not Jews as the abrahamic blessing would have to havee been passed to Judah for this to happen. Judah the father of the Jews would be jealous and conspired with his brothers to have Joseph killed st Joseph into slavery for silver. As Joesph was the one who recieved his fathers abrahamic blessing, much like judas sold Jesus to the Jews, so the Bible portrays Judah as a jealous villain and Joseph as the chosen son.
While in slavery Joesph would rise to become the prime minister of Egypt and father two sons Ephraim and Manasseh pass the abrahamic lesson on to them making them the chosen people and dividing Joseph into two tribes making 13 tribes of Israel. So no we understand that the jews were never intended to bless the world nor were they ever considered the chosen people We can move on to our second point;
Is the Jewish homeland Israel and the answer is yes and not at all Israel was originally called the land of Canaan named after Noahs grandson Canaan and was conquered by the Israelites after they left Egypt with Moses found in the book of Exodus.
The Bible says God commanded the Israelites to punish the Canaanites for their sexuality which lest to child sacrifice and cannibalisim; the word cannibal actually comes from the canaanite practice of eating the children after they were sacrificed to him Canaan and Baal. hence why we call them Cannibals. So dont feel so bad when we learn that god ordered us to exterminate them. The borders of the Jewish homeland were established by Joshua who is one of the descendants of Joseph and not from Judah.
So like the story of Joseph and Judah their children likewise wouldn't get along either after becoming Nations there would be a Civil War the Jews would rule the southern Kingdom of Judea while Joseph sons of rule the northern kingdom keeping the name Israel. They would have different religions, believe in different gods and while Judas Stayed in Judea, Joseph would Ally himself with the Phoenicians and established colonies and trade posts all over the Mediterranean.
Israel would be corrupted by Foreign ideologies and like the Canaanites would fall into materialism sexual immorality and child sacrifice which would lead to them being conquered by the Syrian Empire while some of the Israelites and Phoenicians would flee to their colonies and trade posts fulfilling the promise made to Abraham that the world would be blessed through him as he would be the father of many nations.
So the sons of Joseph would become fruitful and multiply among the Nations forgetting who they are, which shouldn't surprise us as their name mean; fruitful and forgetful.
Just like the northern kingdom the Jews would fall into sexual immorality and start sacrificing their children if they would be conquered and enslaved by the Babylonians and Freedom reestablished by the Persians by the Greeks and later occupied by the Romans
While under Roman rule the Jews would launch the greatest revolution in roman history , known as "The great revolt",which would fail. Resulting in the destruction of Jerusalem and their temple, ironically fulfilling Everything Jesus and the Christian side, ( Mark 13;2) said would happen.
The Jews not being satisfied with losing their Temple and Homeland would stab the Romans in the back by launching two more rebellions killing over half a million Greeks in Romans. God would bless the chosen people with two more humiliating defeats along with the banishment from the land causing Judea to be renamed Syria palaestina. So the reason the jews have been able to take Palestine really rest on the fact that they stole the name Israel and of convinced the Christian West that they are the chosen people and that they alone are Israel but once putting things into perspective we see that just isn't true. Which brings us to our third point;
Do the Jews believe in the Old Testament? answer; Kind of and not really. while waiving around the Old Testament as if they believe in it Jews actually have secondary books that they consider just as important the main book being called the talmud
To explain the Talmud, we have to understand some basic Jewish Roman history going back to Emperor Claudius who like emperor Tiberius tried to ban the jews from Rome and branding them "aggressive trouble makers ". Sadly Claudius didnt understand how to play "The Game of Thrones" and ended up mysteriously being killed.
His successor Emperor Nero, would lift the Jewish ban which shouldn't surprises considering the talmud says he was a Jewish convert. Nero and his Jews would engage in some of the most barbaric acts known to man; just to give you an idea of how crazy this Pro Jewish Roman Emperor was Nero burned down Rome and blamed it on the Christians causing them to be tortured and killed in the worst ways imaginable.
He murdered his entire family and kicked his pregnant wife and child to death and then castrated a young boy ( Sporus) forced him to wear a dress and made him his wife. With the coming of Jesus the Jews would divide into two main groups those who believe that Jesus is the Messiah, while the other group of Jews rejected this claim believing that their Messiah would come wielding a sword todestroy the Romans and set up a Jewish Empire which is what led the Jews to revolt against Rome in the first place. That and they just didnt want to pay taxes. after their failed rebellions the jews retreated to Babylon creating the religion we know today as Judaisim, making Christianity older by about 200 years. The Jews would argue that the Taldud is the oral law passed down "orally" without any mistakes since the time of Moses before finally being written down between 200 and 400 years after Jesus.
This would place the jews in first place above the Muslims for the longest most successful game of broken telephone ever played.
The Talmud speaks of its love for Christians by calling the mother of Jesus a w**** and calling Jesus Ambassador sorcerer who is in Hell boiling in human s*** .
Which brings us to our last point. Is the old tesament about Jews? The answer is no not really because the Jews have stolen the name Israel, you would never guess that the majority of the people in the Bible are not Jewish
The Apostle Paul for instance, even though everyone calls him a Jew, noticehow quickly separates himself from the Jews and says "I am Israelite of the seed of Abraham and of the tribe of Benamin" . God also sent Paul to preach umongst the Israelites and funnily enough Pauls ministry wasnt in Judea but in asia minor, to the greeks in greece and the romans in Rome.
The Bible is constantly separating the Kingdom of Israel from the kingdom of Judah as it is constantly separating Joseph from Judah the entire Jewish deception and hijacking of the Bible depends on them stealing the terms Semites, Hebrews and Israelites for example Moses the man who wrote the first five books Known as the TORAH did not come from the tribe of Judah nor was he part of the kingdom of judea, but somehow he is a "jew"
The reality here is the majority of the people in the Old Testament are not Jewish the Bible is the book that tells the history of many nations and peoples like the Semites Hebrews Israelites Egyptians Phoenicians Babylonians Assyrians Armenians Persian Greeks Romans and many others it's not only about Jews
1. ‘Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have.’Power is derived from 2 main sources – money and people. “Have-Nots” must build power from flesh and blood.
2. ‘Never go outside the expertise of your people.’the result is confusion, fear, and retreat.
3. ‘Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy.’Here you want to cause confusion, fear, and retreat.
4. ‘Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.’You can kill them with this, for they can no more obey their own rules than the Christian church can live up to Christianity.
5. ‘Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.’ It is almost impossible to counterattack ridicule. Also, it infuriates the opposition, who then react to your advantage.
6. ‘A good tactic is one your people enjoy.’If your people are not having a ball doing it, there is something very wrong with the tactic.
7. ‘A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.’Man
can sustain militant interest in any issue for only a limited time,
after which it becomes a ritualistic commitment, like going to church on
Sunday mornings. New issues and crises are always developing, and one’s
reaction becomes, “Well, my heart bleeds for those people and I’m all
for the boycott, but after all, there are other important things in
life”—and there it goes.
8. ‘Keep the pressure on. Never let up.’ [Use] different tactics and actions, and utilize all events of the period for your purpose.
9. ‘The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.’
10. ‘The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition.’It
is this unceasing pressure that results in the reactions from the
opposition that are essential for the success of the campaign. It should
be remembered not only that the action is in the reaction but that
action is itself the consequence of reaction and of reaction to the
reaction, ad infinitum. The pressure produces the reaction, and constant
pressure sustains action.
11. ‘If you push a negative hard and deep enough it will break through into its counterside [positive].’ This
is based on the principle that every positive has its negative. We have
already seen the conversion of the negative into the positive, in
Mahatma Gandhi’s development of the tactic of passive resistance.
12. ‘The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.’You
cannot risk being trapped by the enemy in his sudden agreement with
your demand and saying ‘You’re right—we don’t know what to do about this
issue. Now you tell us.’
13. ‘Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.’the
opposition must be singled out as the target and “frozen.”…in a
complex, interrelated, urban society, it becomes increasingly difficult
to single out who is to blame for any particular evil. There is a
constant…passing of the buck. …Obviously there is no point to tactics
unless one has a target upon which to center the attacks… If an
organization permits responsibility to be diffused and distributed in a
number of areas, attack becomes impossible.
As the failed predictions pile up, climate experts appear to be more
cautious in making their predictions too specific. The current general
consensus among climate change proponents is that extreme weather
events, such as droughts and storms, will become more prevalent or
intense.
The recently released short-form report from the Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) warns that unless carbon emissions are
cut drastically and promptly, the planet will warm roughly an additional 1.1-2.4 degrees Celsius by 2100 (pdf). That would lead to “high” or “very high”
risk of wildfire damage, permafrost degradation, biodiversity loss,
dryland water scarcity, and tree mortality on the land, and loss of
warm-water corals in the sea. Most of the severe risks are asserted with
moderate or low confidence, meaning that underlying evidence is lacking
or inconclusive.
The full IPCC report hasn’t been released yet.
One of the most famous climate experts, Michael Mann, criticized the
IPCC for being “overly conservative” in predicting catastrophic
consequences of climate change, “including ice sheet collapse, sea level
rise, and the rise in extreme weather events,” Inside Climate News reported.
But it’s been exactly these kinds of bold predictions that have undermined experts’ credibility in the past.
Environmentalist Bjorn Lomborg has collected some
such failed predictions in his book, “False Alarm: How Climate Change
Panic Costs Us Trillions, Hurts the Poor, and Fails to Fix the Planet.”
Geologist and electrical engineer Tony Heller, who frequently criticizes
what he considers fraud in current mainstream climate research, has
made it a recurring theme of his climate science blog to point out failed and dubious predictions.
Examples are plentiful, stretching far into the past:
December 1939
“All the glaciers in Eastern Greenland are rapidly melting,” the Harrisburg [Pennsylvania] Sunday Courier reported.
“It may without exaggeration be said that the glaciers—like those in
Norway—face the possibility of a catastrophic collapse,” the paper
quoted Prof. Hans Ahlmann, a Swedish geologist, saying from a report to
the Geographical Society after his Arctic expedition.
In fact, arctic ice was seen receding since 1918, according to a 1923 New York Time article.
“Last Winter, oceans did not freeze over even on the north coast of Spitzbergen,” article said.
By comparison, this winter, sea ice did reach the shore of Spitzbergen, though in low concentrations.
Back then, however, the meltdown seemed nowhere near done.
May 1947
“The possibility of a prodigious rise in the surface of the ocean
with resultant widespread inundation, arising from an Arctic climate
phenomenon[,] was discussed yesterday by Dr. Hans Ahlmann, a noted
Swedish geophysicist at the University of California Geophysical
Institute,” an article in The West Australian read.
“The Arctic change is so serious that I hope an international agency
can speedily be formed to study the conditions on a global basis,”
Ahlmann said.
February 1952
“The glaciers of Norway and Alaska are only half the size they were 50 years ago,” said Dr. William Carlson, an Arctic expert, according to a newswire run by The Cairns Post in Australia.
March 1955
“There are now six million square miles of ice in the Arctic. There
once were 12 million square miles,” said Arctic explorer Adm. Donald
McMillan, according to Rochester, New York’s Democrat and Chronicle.
October 1958
“Some scientists estimate that the polar ice pack is 40 percent
thinner and 12 percent less in area than it was a half-century ago, and
that even within the lifetime of our children, the Arctic Ocean may
open, enabling ships to sail over the North Pole,” The New York Times
reported, noting that the Arctic ice sheet was about 7 feet thick at the
time. Currently, the ice is about 7 feet thick, too.
By the 1960s, it appears that worries about a melting Arctic became
not as immediate, only to be supplanted by other environmental concerns.
November 1967
“It is already too late for the world to avoid a long period of famine,” The Salt Lake Tribune reported, citing Paul Ehrlich’s prediction of famines by 1975.
Ehrlich, a Stanford University biologist and author of “The
Population Bomb,” proposed lacing staple foods and drinking water with
sterilizing agents to cut the growing population of the United States,
according to the report.
April 1970
“Scientist predicts a new ice age by 21st century,” The Boston Globe reported,
saying that pollution expert James Lodge predicted that “air pollution
may obliterate the sun and cause a new ice age in the first third of the
new century.”
October 1970
Ehrlich went on to predict that America would be rationing water by 1974 and food by 1980, California’s Redlands Daily Facts reported.
July 1971
“The world could be as little as 50 or 60 years away from a
disastrous new ice age,” said atmospheric scientist S. I. Rasool of the
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and Columbia
University, The Washington Post reported.
January 1972
“We have 10 years to stop the catastrophe,” said Maurice Strong,
then-U.N. environmental secretary, regarding world’s environmental
problems, according to a Swedish newspaper Dagens Nyheter.
December 1972
Two Brown University geologists wrote a letter to
President Richard Nixon, reporting that a conference attended by “42
top American and European investigators” concluded “a global
deterioration of climate, by order of magnitude larger than any hitherto
experienced by civilized mankind, is a very real possibility and indeed
may be due very soon.”
“The present rate of cooling,” they said, “seems fast enough to bring
glacial temperatures in about a century, if continuing at the present
pace.”
January 1974
“Space satellites show new Ice Age coming fast,” The Guardian reported.
June 1974
“Another Ice Age?” a Time Magazine headline asked.
“Telltale signs are everywhere—from the unexpected persistence and
thickness of pack ice in the waters around Iceland to the southward
migration of a warmth-loving creature like the armadillo from the
Midwest,” the article said.
January 1978
“An international team of specialists has concluded from eight
indexes of climate that there is no end in sight to the cooling trend of
the last 30 years, at least in the Northern Hemisphere,” The New York
Times reported.
A year later, the paper was reporting the opposite.
February 1979
“There is a real possibility that some people now in their infancy
will live to a time when the ice at the North Pole will have melted, a
change that would cause swift and perhaps catastrophic changes in
climate,” The New York Times said.
May 1982
Mostafa Tolba, then-executive director of the U.N. environmental
program, said that if the world didn’t change course, it would face “an
environmental catastrophe which will witness devastation as complete, as
irreversible, as any nuclear holocaust’’ by the year 2000, according to The New York Times.
September 1988
The small island nation of Maldives was threatened to be completely
covered by “a gradual rise in average sea level” in 30 years, Agence
France-Presse reported,
noting that “the end of the Maldives and its people could come sooner
if drinking water supplies dry up by 1992, as predicted.”
Tourists pose for pictures at the Velana International Airport in the Maldives on July 14, 2022. (AFP via Getty Images)
Maldives are still nowhere near under water. In fact, despite the
COVID-19 pandemic’s decimation of tourism, the nation still attracts new
developments. Just last week, Emirati development company awarded a
$148 million contract to build 120 luxurious over-water and beachfront
villas on Maledives’ South Male Atoll, Hotelier Maledives reported.
June 1989
“A senior environmental official at the United Nations, Noel Brown,
says entire nations could be wiped off the face of the earth by rising
sea levels if global warming is not reversed by the year 2000,”
California’s San Jose Mercury News reported.
“Coastal flooding and crop failures would create an exodus of
‘eco-refugees,’ threatening political chaos,” said Brown, then-director
of the New York office of the U.N. Environment Program.
March 2000
A snowman at the High Plains Bar and Restuarant at Dinner Plains at
Mount Hotham, in Mount Hotham, Australia, on June 17, 2005. (Mark
Dadswell/Getty Images).
“Snowfalls are now just a thing of the past,” The Independent wrote.
“Children just aren’t going to know what snow is,” said David Viner, a
senior research scientist at the climatic research unit of England’s
University of East Anglia, noting that within a few years, winter
snowfall would become “a very rare and exciting event.”
While snow is rare in southern England, it still comes pretty much every winter.
December 2001
“The changes in climate could potentially extirpate the sugar maple
industry in New England” within 20 years, according to George Hurtt,
co-author of a 2001 global warming report commissioned by the U.S.
Congress, according to Albuquerque Journal.
Today, New England still produces plenty of maple syrup.
February 2004
The Guardian reported
on a secret Pentagon report that predicted climate change will lead to
nuclear war, major European cities will sink into the ocean, and Britain
would descend into “Siberian” climate by the year 2020.
January 2006
“Unless drastic measures to reduce greenhouse gases are taken within
the next 10 years, the world will reach a point of no return,” The
Associated Press wrote, paraphrasing Al Gore, a prominent global warming
advocate.
November 2007
This year was the “defining moment” of the climate change fight,
according to Rajendra Pachauri, then-head of the U.N. climate panel. “If
there is no action before 2012, that’s too late,” the official said, according to The New York Times.
November 2007
“The Arctic Ocean could be free of ice in the summer as soon as 2010
or 2015—something that hasn’t happened in more than a million years,”
Canada’s Canwest News Service reported, paraphrasing polar researcher
Louis Fortier.
December 2007
“Arctic Sea Ice Gone in Summer Within Five Years?” said an Associated Press headline.
“At this rate, the Arctic Ocean could be nearly ice-free at the end
of summer by 2012,” said Jay Zwally, a NASA climate scientist, according
to the article.
December 2007
“Artic summers ice-free ‘by 2013’” the BBC reported.
“Our projection of 2013 for the removal of ice in summer is not
accounting for the last two minima, in 2005 and 2007,” a researcher from
the Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California, told the BBC.
“So given that fact, you can argue that maybe our projection of 2013 is already too conservative.”
March 2008
“If Norway’s average temperature this year equals that in 2007, the
ice cap in the Arctic will all melt away, which is highly possible
judging from current conditions,” said Olav Orheim, head of the
Norwegian International Polar Year Secretariat, according to Xinhua,
China’s official propaganda mouthpiece.
Norway’s average temperature did slightly increase from 2007 to 2008. The ice didn’t melt.
April 2008
“North Pole could be ice free in 2008,” reported New Scientist.
“There is this thin first-year ice even at the North Pole at the
moment,” said Mark Serreze, director of the National Snow and Ice Data
Center, according to the article. “That raises the specter—the
possibility—that you could become ice free at the North Pole this year.”
June 2008
“We’re actually projecting this year that the North Pole may be free
of ice for the first time [in history],” said David Barber, of the
University of Manitoba, according to National Geographic News.
June 2008
“In five to 10 years, the Arctic will be free of ice in the summer,” The Associated Press reported, paraphrasing James Hansen, director of NASA’s Goddard Institute of Space Sciences.
December 2009
Former U.S. Vice President Al Gore makes a speech during the COP24 U.N.
climate summit in Katowice, Poland, on Dec. 12, 2018. (AP Photo/Czarek
Sokolowski)
“The Arctic Ocean may be nearly ice-free in summer as early as 2014,” Al Gore said, according to USA Today.
September 2012
“Enjoy snow now … by 2020, it’ll be gone,” The Australian reported. It still snows in Australia. Last year’s snowfall was, in fact, significantly above average.
July 2013
“Ice-free Arctic in two years heralds methane catastrophe—scientist,” The Guardian reported.
February 2014
“The End of Snow?” asked a New York Times op-ed headline, talking
about declining snowpack in Western United States. The past decade
overall has marked no significant snowfall decline in the region.
July 2017
After then-U.S. President Donald Trump pulled the United States out
of the U.N. Paris Climate Agreement, physicist Stephen Hawking said,
according to BBC: “We are close to the tipping point, where global
warming becomes irreversible. Trump’s action could push the Earth over
the brink, to become like Venus, with a temperature of 250 degrees
[Celsius] and raining sulfuric acid.”
August 2017
“Snowy retreat: Climate change puts Australia’s ski industry on a downhill slope,” The Sydney Morning Herald reported. It’s been snowing quite as usual in Australia in recent years, weather data indicates.
January 2018
“The chance that there will be any permanent ice left in the Arctic
after 2022 is essentially zero,” said James Anderson, a Harvard
University professor of atmospheric chemistry, according to Forbes.
Elementary, high school and college students gather in front of the
Parliament building in Oslo on March 22, 2019, to rally for the climate
and against politicians who they dont think are doing enough to halt
climate change. (TOM HANSEN/AFP/Getty Images)
July 2020
“The end of snow,” said an Australian Geographic headline. “Could a warming climate be putting Australia’s magnificent alpine landscapes at risk?”
There was no particular lack of snow in Australia in either 2021 or 2022.
December 2021
The Los Angeles Times ran a story headlined, “A ‘no snow’ California could come sooner than you think.”
A few weeks later, the UC Berkely Central Sierra Snow Lab announced that California just had the snowiest December on record.
August 2022
“The End of Snow Threatens to Upend 76 Million American Lives,” Bloomberg reported, referring to predictions of snow disappearance in the western United States.
A few months later, Sierra Nevada mountains would see its second snowiest winter on record.
March 2023
“Arctic ice has seen an ‘irreversible’ thinning since 2007, study says,” The Washington Post reported.
The ice hasn’t thinned much over the past decade.
Since 1979, the summer minima have seen a record low every 5-7 years. Since 2012, however, there has been no new record, the data shows.
“If I were the devil …
If I were the Prince of Darkness, I’d want to engulf the whole world in
darkness. And I’d have a third of its real estate, and four-fifths of
its population, but I wouldn’t be happy until I had seized the ripest
apple on the tree — Thee. So I’d set about however necessary to take
over the United States. I’d subvert the churches first — I’d begin with a
campaign of whispers. With the wisdom of a serpent, I would whisper to
you as I whispered to Eve: ‘Do as you please.
To the young,
I would whisper that ‘The Bible is a myth.’ I would convince them that
man created God instead of the other way around. I would confide that
what’s bad is good, and what’s good is ‘square.’ And the old, I would
teach to pray, after me, ‘Our Father, which art in Washington…
And
then I’d get organized. I’d educate authors in how to make lurid
literature exciting, so that anything else would appear dull and
uninteresting. I’d threaten TV with dirtier movies and vice versa. I’d
pedal narcotics to whom I could. I’d sell alcohol to ladies and
gentlemen of distinction. I’d tranquilize the rest with pills.
If
I were the devil I’d soon have families at war with themselves,
churches at war with themselves, and nations at war with themselves;
until each in its turn was consumed. And with promises of higher ratings
I’d have mesmerizing media fanning the flames. If I were the devil I
would encourage schools to refine young intellects, but neglect to
discipline emotions — just let those run wild, until before you knew it,
you’d have to have drug sniffing dogs and metal detectors at every
schoolhouse door.
Within a decade I’d have prisons
overflowing, I’d have judges promoting pornography — soon I could evict
God from the courthouse, then from the schoolhouse, and then from the
houses of Congress. And in His own churches I would substitute
psychology for religion, and deify science. I would lure priests and
pastors into misusing boys and girls, and church money. If I were the
devil I’d make the symbols of Easter an egg and the symbol of Christmas a
bottle.
If I were the devil I’d take from those who have, and give to those who want until I had killed the incentive of the ambitious.
And
what do you bet I could get whole states to promote gambling as the way
to get rich? I would caution against extremes and hard work in
Patriotism, in moral conduct. I would convince the young that marriage
is old-fashioned, that swinging is more fun, that what you see on the TV
is the way to be. And thus, I could undress you in public, and I could
lure you into bed with diseases for which there is no cure. In other
words, if I were the devil I’d just keep right on doing what he’s
doing.”
I cannot post on any you tube channel it just gets removed INSTANTLY
My email; 24th April
Dear M; So, even though this Poem has clearly broken the law and the media council now is aware of the breach. Would you not be also complicit in the breach of the law and thereby liable for the remedies as listed in the act?
Sorry, that poem is not art and clearly is incitement as laid out in the legislation. The act, I assume triumphs over your "12 principles".
As you are unwilling to reverse the decision and by doing so promote this "hate speech" You will then accept the remedies laid out in the Human Rights (Incitement on Ground of Religious Belief) Amendment Bill
Government Bill 209—1 Which as I understand it amounts to;
"Every person commits an offence and is liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $5,000 who contravenes or refuses to comply with any other order of the Tribunal made under section 92I or an interim order of the Tribunal made under section 95."
A sum the media council could well afford, though in these difficult times an individual may find difficult.
Why Margot are you protecting these vile people Irrespective of race or religion. you know in yourself the actions you and your team are pursuing are wrong.
Please retract your position.
Kind Regards Stephen Watson
Date; 26/4
Good morning Stephen Thank you for you email.
The Media Council carefully considered the issues raised by you and the other complainants regarding this poem and will not be retracting its decision.
Regards (M/c hammer)
Ps I noticed she stopped using Maori !
Date 24th April
My Email for context
Dear Ms C;
Thank you for your reply with regards to (TUISATA AVIA POEM) CASE NO: 3392 RULING BY THE NEW ZEALAND MEDIA COUNCIL;
However, I cannot accept such a ludicrous finding.
I Quote from legislation: Human Rights (Incitement on Ground of Religious Belief) Amendment Bill
Government Bill
209—1; Quote" Clause 5amends section 61, which makes it unlawful for anyone to publish, distribute, or use threatening, abusive, or insulting written matter or words likely to excite hostility against or bring into contempt any group on 1 or more of the following prohibited grounds of discrimination:
colour:
race:
ethnic or national origins.
Clause 5adds religious belief to that list. Religious belief is an existing prohibited ground of discrimination under section 21."
The poem in question clearly violates Clause 5. The poem in Question is; "threatening, abusive, or insulting written matter or words likely to excite hostility against or bring into contempt any group"
In all fairness I offer you the right to ammend your decision or to reply before this complaint is taken further and the matter escalates.
Kind Regards
Stephen Watson
M/c Hammers Reply;
Kia ora Stephen
Thank you for your email.
The Media Council considers complaints under its twelve Principles.
The Human Rights commission hears complaints under the Human Rights legislation that you quote. If you wish to make a complaint to the Human Rights Commission, this is the linkhttps://tikatangata.org.nz/
Nga mihi
Dear Ms C;
Thank you for your reply with regards to (TUISATA AVIA POEM) CASE NO: 3392 RULING BY THE NEW ZEALAND MEDIA COUNCIL;
However, I cannot accept such a ludicrous finding.
I Quote from legislation: Human Rights (Incitement on Ground of Religious Belief) Amendment Bill
Government Bill
209—1; Quote" Clause 5amends section 61, which makes it unlawful for anyone to publish, distribute, or use threatening, abusive, or insulting written matter or words likely to excite hostility against or bring into contempt any group on 1 or more of the following prohibited grounds of discrimination:
colour:
race:
ethnic or national origins.
Clause 5adds religious belief to that list. Religious belief is an existing prohibited ground of discrimination under section 21."
The poem in question clearly violates Clause 5. The poem in Question is; "threatening, abusive, or insulting written matter or words likely to excite hostility against or bring into contempt any group"
In all fairness I offer you the right to amend your decision or to reply before this complaint is taken further and the matter escalates.
Kind Regards
Stephen Watson
On Wed, 2023-04-12 at 17:33 +0000, M/C Hammer wrote:
Morena
Please find attached the NZ Media Council’s ruling in the eleven complaints against Stuff’s publication of Tuisata Avia’s poem about James Cook.
Nga mihi
Dear Stephen,
If you would like the council to consider your complaint, please send dated copies of your emails with Stuff regarding this article.
NEW ZEALAND MEDIA COUNCIL | Te kaunihera ao pāpāho o Aotearoa
-----Original Message----- From: stephen <stephens.mess@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, 21 February 2023 4:27 PM To: Info-Media Council <info@mediacouncil.org.nz> Subject: Re: 475-23 Watson v Stuff
Dear Sir, Madam;
I quote "Stuff.co.nz" reply to my complaint.
I have, therefore complied with your request and have recieved a reply.
Therefore I ask, most strongly to take action: remove and reprimand this organisation for inciting racial hatred.
Racial hatred in most civilised countries is a criminal act.
organizations in those "civilised countries" that promote and support racial hatred are liable for prosecution.
I assume that you do not condone or support racial hatred and,or the organisations that promote such vile opinions.
I ask most strongly for you to take action asap. I have forwarded this correspondence to the relevant Ministers of parlement.
Regards
Stephen Watson On Mon, 2023-02-20 at 02:35 +0000, Info-Media Council wrote: > Kia ora Stephen, > > Thank you for lodging your complaint with the NZ Media Council. > > Our procedure requires you first complain to the publisher so they > have an opportunity to resolve the matter. If you have already done > this can you please forward your complaint and their response to the > Media Council by 6 March or as soon as possible. We will then be able > to assess your complaint . > > We will wait to hear from you. > > Thanks and kind regards, > > mv > > From: Stephen <stephens.mess@gmail.com> > Sent: Monday, 20 February 2023 3:16 PM > To: Info-Media Council <info@mediacouncil.org.nz> > Subject: Cannot lodge a complaint via website > > Dear Sir, Madam; > I would like to lodge a very strong complaint about a vile article > masquerading as an "opinion piece" in the online newspaper; >https://www.stuff.co.nz/The article in question quite clearly > promotes Racial hatred. >https://www.stuff.co.nz/life-style/sunday-magazine/131236724/tusiata-a > via-cant-wait-to-make-you-uncomfortable > > I quote from the article, showing clear and explicit unequivocal > Racial hatred. ( see the quote at the bottom of this Email) > > If this is allowed to continue then similar views expressed in Germany > earlier this century also would be valid. > > Please remove this vile article masquerading as an opinion piece as > soon as possible and issue a public reprimand. > > Yours Faithfully > Mr Stephen Watson > Christchurch New Zealand > > Quote " > 250th anniversary of James Cook’s arrival in New Zealand Hey James, > yeah, you in the white wig in that big Endeavour sailing the blue, > blue water like a big arsehole F… YOU, BITCH. > James, > I heard someone > shoved a knife > right up > into the gap between > your white ribs > at Kealakekua Bay. > I’m gonna go there > make a big Makahiki luau > cook a white pig > feed it to the dogs > and F… YOU UP, BITCH. ( my note, this is CLEAR INTENT ) > Hey James, > it’s us. > These days > we’re driving round > in SUVs > looking for ya > or white men like you > who might be thieves > or rapists > or kidnappers > or murderers > yeah, or any of your descendants > or any of your incarnations > cos, you know > ay, bitch? > We’re gonna F… YOU UP. > Tonight, James, > it’s me > Lani, Danielle > and a car full of brown girls > we find you > on the corner > of the Justice Precinct. > You’ve got another woman > in a headlock > and I’ve got my father’s > pig-hunting knife > in my fist > and we’re coming to get you > sailing round > in your Resolution > your Friendship > your Discovery > and your f…ing Freelove. > Watch your ribs, James > cos, I’m coming with > Kalaniōpu‘u > Kānekapōlei > Kana‘ina > Keawe‘ōpala > Kūka‘ilimoku > who is a god > and Nua‘a > who is king with a knife. > And then > James, > then > we’re gonna > F…. > YOU. > UP. > FOR. > GOOD. > BITCH. > - Tusiata Avia > Image removed by sender. Sunday magazine logo >
