Skip to main content

Mr Trotters Speech 1

In one sense that is very good news for NZUSA. It shows that your national organisation has become a
permanent fixture in the array of interest groups with which the New Zealand State must negotiate.
Yes, that’s right, you are up there with Federated Farmers and the Plunket Society.
From my own perspective, however, that gap of 22 years covers a period in New Zealand history
during which much of what made this country a uniquely positive place in which to live has
disappeared, or changed beyond all recognition.
What I say to you today is, therefore, being communicated across a great abyss of experience and
expectation. For you are, indeed, the children of the Rogernomics Revolution, and I am an overweight
and ageing survivor of the ancien regime.
Let me describe a little of the country I lived in when last I spoke to NZUSA – not merely for
nostalgia’s sake – but because I believe it will help to place in context the challenges that face the
present generation of student politicians; challenges which, rest assured, constitute the substance of my
address to you today.
In 1981 tertiary education was almost entirely subsidised by the state. Sure, there were a number of
token payments at the commencement of every year, the largest of which, I seem to recall, was my
studass fees, but, by and large, my tuition costs – and a respectably large chunk of my living expenses –
were paid for by the State.
The State itself was much larger then - employing between a quarter and a third of the entire
workforce. It owned two of the country’s largest banks, all of its telecommunications network, its
airlines, its railways, its biggest bus service, a shipping line, its entire electricity generation system, its
largest construction force, most of its forests, a chain of tourist hotels, all of its television networks,
nearly all of its radio stations, a weekly newsmagazine, thousands of rental properties, and a host of
other services which I have forgotten. Capitalism existed in New Zealand, but only on terms
established by the New Zealand people in the wake of a protracted global depression and a genocidal
world war.
But the thing that I remember most vividly about the world before Rogernomics is that people had
much more time.
New Zealanders back then did not live to work, they worked to live. Unless you were employed by an
emergency service – or the corner dairy – you had the weekend off.
For two whole days every week the entire economy virtually shut down. And if the Boss wanted you to
work more than eight hours in a single day during the week – Boy, did the trade unions make him pay.
Time-and-a-half, double-time, and on public holidays – triple time.
If you were lucky enough to get a holiday job in a hospital over Christmas-New Year, you could earn a
normal week’s wages in less than 16 hours.
And if you grew tired of your job, if you got bored with the routines of office or factory, you simply
jacked it in. Full employment meant that you could step out of the workforce whenever you felt like it –
take time out to go fishing, or tramping, or go in search of the big OE in Australia, London or

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Names to remember

 Micheal Cohen Gil Dezer Micheal Dezer Alan Fishman alan Garten Micheal Glassner Jason Greenblatt Carl Icahn Charles Kushner Jarad Kushner Yael Kushner Richard lefrak Cory Lewandowshi StephenMiller Sam Nunberg Stewart Rahr George Rosi Phil Ruffin Felix Sauter Allen Weisseburg Steve wynn Lara yunaska ALL in the tramp back office campaign team    I wonder what they have in Common ?

The Boy who cried wolf a small sample of failed climate predictions

 From the epoch Times   As the failed predictions pile up, climate experts appear to be more cautious in making their predictions too specific. The current general consensus among climate change proponents is that extreme weather events, such as droughts and storms, will become more prevalent or intense. The recently released short-form report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) warns that unless carbon emissions are cut drastically and promptly , the planet will warm roughly an additional 1.1-2.4 degrees Celsius by 2100 ( pdf ). That would lead to “high” or “ very high ” risk of wildfire damage, permafrost degradation, biodiversity loss, dryland water scarcity, and tree mortality on the land, and loss of warm-water corals in the sea. Most of the severe risks are asserted with moderate or low confidence, meaning that underlying evidence is lacking or inconclusive. The full IPCC report hasn’t been released yet. One of the most famous climate ...

Treaty between the Russian Federation and Ukraine on Friendship, Cooperation and Partnership, signed in Kiev on 31 May 1997

UNITED NATIONS A General Assembly Distr. GENERAL A/52/174 9 June 1997 ENGLISH ORIGINAL: RUSSIAN Fifty-second session Items 38 and 81 of the preliminary list* SUPPORT BY THE UNITED NATIONS SYSTEM OF THE EFFORTS OF GOVERNMENTS TO PROMOTE AND CONSOLIDATE NEW OR RESTORED DEMOCRACIES MAINTENANCE OF INTERNATIONAL SECURITY  Letter dated 6 June 1997 from the Permanent Representatives of the Russian Federation and the Ukraine to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General We have the honour to transmit the texts of the Treaty between the Russian Federation and Ukraine on Friendship, Cooperation and Partnership (annex I), a Russian-Ukrainian declaration  (annex II) and a joint statement by the Russian Federation and Ukraine (annex III), signed on 31 May 1997 in Kiev by the President of the Russian Federation, Mr. Boris N. Yeltsin, and the President of Ukraine, Mr. Leonid D. Kuchma. We should be grateful if you would have this letter and its annexes circulated as a document of ...